SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Frances P. Kuperman

Last decided BaltimoreSep 2017
Decisions 397since 2016

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review

Approval rates

The 72% approval rate for Frances P. Kuperman reflects all decisions on record since 2016, which you can measure against the 32% to 79% range of other judges whose most recent office on record is Baltimore. These statistics are based on 397 decisions on record, providing a clear view of past activity. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for your individual hearing.

All decisions on record SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 72%
Decisions on record 397

SSA has not published a latest-period approval, fully favorable or denial breakdown for Judge Kuperman. The most recent period with decisions on record is September 29, 2017. Those rows are left out rather than estimated.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Kuperman's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Kuperman
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY17
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

The approval rate for Frances P. Kuperman remained steady during the period of 2016 to 2017. With 330 decisions in 2016 and 203 decisions in 2017, the data shows a consistent approach to case evaluation. These 397 total decisions on record since 2016 provide a stable view of the judge's historical pattern.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Kuperman's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Baltimore hearing office

Frances P. Kuperman's most recent office on record is the Baltimore hearing office, which serves you in Maryland and the surrounding region. This office has seen 24 judges with records since 2016. You can expect a standard administrative process focused on medical evidence and vocational testimony.

Other judges whose most recent office on record is Baltimore

The Social Security Administration assigns cases using a workload-balancing algorithm, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. There are 24 judges whose most recent office on record is the Baltimore hearing office, with approval rates ranging from 32% to 79% on their since-2016 records. For preparation purposes, the guidance is the same regardless of which judge you are assigned.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
1×
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions