SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Sasha Kurbegov

Position Administrative Law Judge
On record SSA records since 2023
Decisions 1,094 lifetime

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review
Free
2 minutes
Confidential

Approval rates

Sasha Kurbegov's 75% lifetime approval rate is at the top end of the 31% to 75% range observed among the 22 judges on record at the Denver office. In the most recent reporting period, the judge maintained a 75% approval rate, which sits 14 percentage points above the office-wide latest-period average of 61%. These figures are based on a docket of 1,094 lifetime decisions, providing a stable statistical baseline for your review.

Lifetime SSA records since 2023
Approval rate 75%
Decisions on record 1,094
Latest SSA reporting period July 31, 2026
Metric Judge Kurbegov Denver National
Approval rate 75% 61% 58%
Fully favorable 66%
Denials 25%

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Kurbegov's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Kurbegov
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY23FY26
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total dispositions excluding dismissals.

Decision pattern

Since 2023, the decision pattern for Sasha Kurbegov has shown notable activity, with an approval rate that reached 82% in 2025 before settling at 75% in the most recent period. Across 1,094 lifetime decisions, the judge has demonstrated a consistent approach to evaluating disability claims. The latest period reflects a 66% fully-favorable rate and a 25% denial rate. This trend suggests a judge who remains focused on the specific medical evidence presented in your file.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Kurbegov's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Denver hearing office

The Denver hearing office serves claimants across Colorado and the surrounding region. It is staffed by a bench of 22 judges on record, maintaining an office-wide latest-period approval rate of 61%. If you are appearing here, you can expect a review of your medical documentation and vocational history. For more information, see the /disability-benefits/hearing-offices/denver-CO Hearing Office page for the full ALJ roster.

Other judges at this hearing office

The Social Security Administration assigns cases using a workload-balancing algorithm, meaning your assignment to Sasha Kurbegov is essentially random. Within the Denver hearing office, there are 22 judges on record since 2016, with 9 currently reporting in the latest SSA data. Approval rates across this bench vary significantly, ranging from 31% to 75% on a lifetime basis. Your preparation remains the same regardless of which judge is assigned to your case.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions