SSDI Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Monica LaPolt

SSDI Administrative Law Judge at the Indianapolis Hearing Office · 10 years on the bench · 22,030 lifetime decisions

Check My Benefits →
Free
2 minutes
Confidential

Approval rates

Judge LaPolt maintains an approval rate that aligns with the Indianapolis Hearing Office average of 61%. When compared to the national average of 58%, her recent performance demonstrates a consistent approach to evaluating disability claims. With over a decade of experience and a high volume of decisions, these figures provide a reliable look at her historical patterns.

Metric Judge LaPolt Indianapolis National
Approval rate 61% 61% 58%
Fully favorable 61%
Denials 34%

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge LaPolt's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge LaPolt
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY25
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total dispositions excluding dismissals.

Decision pattern

Over your 10 years on the bench, Judge LaPolt has navigated various shifts in case volume and approval trends. Her career began with a 56% approval rate in 2016, followed by a peak of 71% in 2017. While the data shows fluctuations—including a dip to 50% in 2021—the most recent reporting period shows a 66% approval rate. This pattern suggests a judge whose decision-making remains responsive to the evidence you present in your case.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge LaPolt's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing with Judge LaPolt? Free, confidential — see if you qualify for SSDI.

Check My Benefits
Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Indianapolis hearing office

The Indianapolis Hearing Office serves a broad population across Indiana, managing a high volume of disability claims with a team of 6 administrative law judges. The office currently maintains an approval rate of 61%, reflecting regional trends in disability adjudication. You can expect a standard administrative process focused on your medical documentation and vocational testimony.

Other judges at this hearing office

The Social Security Administration utilizes a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning your assignment to a specific judge is random. Within the Indianapolis Hearing Office, lifetime approval rates among the bench range from 48% to 72%. This variance highlights why focusing on the strength of your medical evidence is the most effective strategy. The guidance for your hearing remains the same regardless of which judge you are assigned.

Your odds change dramatically with a lawyer

SSDI hearing approval rates — represented vs. on your own

WITHOUT A LAWYER
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants
Check My Benefits

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions