SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Monica LaPolt

Position Administrative Law Judge
On record SSA records since 2016
Decisions 3,916 lifetime

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review
Free
2 minutes
Confidential

Approval rates

The following data compares the performance of Monica LaPolt against broader benchmarks. Her lifetime approval rate of 62% sits within the 43% to 75% range observed across the Indianapolis bench. In the most recent reporting period, her 70% approval rate compares to a 64% office-wide rate, a 60% state rate, and a 58% national rate. These figures provide context for your hearing, though aggregate rates describe past decisions rather than predictions for your individual case.

Lifetime SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 62%
Decisions on record 3,916
Latest SSA reporting period July 31, 2026
Metric Judge LaPolt Indianapolis National
Approval rate 70% 64% 58%
Fully favorable 66%
Denials 30%

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge LaPolt's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge LaPolt
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY26
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

Since 2016, Monica LaPolt has issued 3,916 decisions. Her approval rate has fluctuated over the years, showing a recent trend toward higher approval figures compared to the mid-record period. While the latest-period approval rate of 70% is higher than her lifetime average, it reflects the most recent data available. This pattern suggests that the judge's approach to evidence and testimony has evolved, and the latest period reflects a continuation of this recent shift.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge LaPolt's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Indianapolis hearing office

The Indianapolis hearing office serves claimants across Indiana, managing a high volume of disability cases. With 20 judges on record, the office maintains an office-wide latest-period approval rate of 64%. You can expect a formal process where the quality of your medical evidence remains the primary factor in the outcome. You can see the Indianapolis Hearing Office page for the full ALJ roster.

Other judges at this hearing office

The Social Security Administration uses a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. There are 20 judges on record at this office since 2016, 11 of whom reported in the latest period. Approval rates across this bench vary significantly, ranging from 43% to 75% on lifetime records. For preparation purposes, the guidance is the same regardless of which judge you are assigned.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions