SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Roy E. LaRoche Jr.

Last decided Oak ParkSep 2025
Decisions 3,116since 2016

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review

Approval rates

The approval rate for Roy E. LaRoche Jr. is calculated from 3,116 decisions on record since 2016. This figure provides a baseline for understanding how past rulings compare to the broader bench at the Oak Park hearing office, where peers range from 36% to 83% approval on their own since-2016 records. Because the SSA assigns cases through a workload-balancing algorithm, your specific assignment is random. These aggregate rates reflect historical data rather than a guarantee of your outcome.

All decisions on record SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 36%
Decisions on record 3,116

SSA has not published a latest-period approval, fully favorable or denial breakdown for Judge LaRoche Jr.. The most recent period with decisions on record is September 26, 2025. Those rows are left out rather than estimated.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge LaRoche Jr.'s docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge LaRoche Jr.
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY25
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

Since 2016, the approval rate for Roy E. LaRoche Jr. has fluctuated across 3,116 decisions on record. After starting at 30% in 2016, the annual approval rate reached a peak of 46% in 2023 before settling at 40% in 2025. This trend indicates that while the rate has varied year-over-year, it has remained within a consistent range throughout the observation period.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge LaRoche Jr.'s bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Oak Park hearing office

The Oak Park hearing office serves you and other claimants across Michigan and the surrounding region. With 19 judges whose most recent office on record is this location, it manages a significant volume of disability hearings. You can expect a formal process focused on the specific medical evidence presented in your case file. You can view the Oak Park hearing office page for the full ALJ roster.

Other judges whose most recent office on record is Oak Park

The Social Security Administration assigns cases using a workload-balancing algorithm, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. There are 19 judges whose most recent office on record is the Oak Park hearing office, with an approval-rate range of 36% to 83% on their since-2016 records. Nine of these judges decided cases here in the SSA's latest file. Your preparation remains consistent regardless of which judge is assigned to your case.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
1×
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions