SSDI Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Hallie E. Larsen

SSDI Administrative Law Judge at the Fargo Hearing Office · 8 years on the bench · 21,170 lifetime decisions

Hearing scheduled with Judge Larsen?

Free Benefits Review →
Free
2 minutes
Confidential

Approval rates

The approval rate for Hallie E. Larsen is calculated based on 21,170 lifetime decisions rendered over 8 years on the bench. When comparing recent performance, the judge's approval rate is 16 percentage points lower than the Fargo office average and 12 points below the national average. These figures provide a statistical baseline for understanding the judge's history, though aggregate rates describe past decisions rather than predictions for your individual hearing.

Metric Judge Larsen Fargo National
Approval rate 46% 62% 58%
Fully favorable 39%
Denials 54%

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Larsen's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Larsen
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY23
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total dispositions excluding dismissals.

Decision pattern

Over an 8-year tenure, the decision pattern for Hallie E. Larsen has remained relatively steady. With 21,170 lifetime decisions, the data shows a consistent approach to case evaluation. While the approval rate saw a peak of 51% in 2017, it has trended toward a more moderate range in recent years, suggesting a stable judicial philosophy throughout the judge's time at the Fargo office.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Larsen's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing with Judge Larsen? Free, confidential — see if you qualify for SSDI.

Free Benefits Review
Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Fargo hearing office

The Fargo Hearing Office serves you if you are located across North Dakota and parts of the surrounding region. As one of the primary hubs for disability adjudication in the area, the office manages a significant volume of cases with a bench of 6 administrative law judges. The office currently maintains an approval rate of 62%, reflecting the broader regional trends in disability claims processing.

Other judges at this hearing office

The Social Security Administration uses a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. Within the Fargo Hearing Office, lifetime approval rates among the 6 judges range from 46% to 64%. Because of this variance, it is common to research your assigned judge to understand the local bench.

Your odds change dramatically with a lawyer

SSDI hearing approval rates — represented vs. on your own

WITHOUT A LAWYER
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants
Free Benefits Review

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions