SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Benita A. Lobo

Position Administrative Law Judge
On record SSA records since 2016
Decisions 857 lifetime

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review
Free
2 minutes
Confidential

Approval rates

The approval rate for Benita A. Lobo reflects her historical decision-making record compared to the broader bench at the Metairie hearing office. While the office-wide lifetime approval rates for all judges on record range from 24% to 54%, your outcome depends on the specific medical evidence and vocational testimony presented in your case. These figures are based on 857 lifetime decisions recorded since 2016. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for your individual hearing.

Lifetime SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 41%
Decisions on record 857

SSA has not published a latest-period approval, fully favorable or denial breakdown for Judge Lobo. The most recent period with decisions on record is September 27, 2019. Those rows are left out rather than estimated.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Lobo's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Lobo
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY18
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total dispositions excluding dismissals.

Decision pattern

Benita A. Lobo's record, spanning from 2016 to 2019, shows a shift in approval patterns over time. After maintaining approval rates of 45% in 2016 and 41% in 2017, the rate changed to 9% in 2018. This trend highlights the importance of presenting a comprehensive medical file that directly addresses the requirements of your specific impairment.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Lobo's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Metairie hearing office

The Metairie hearing office serves you and other claimants throughout the region, providing a local venue for disability hearings. With 9 judges on record since 2016, the office manages a diverse caseload of SSDI and SSI applications. You can expect a formal administrative process where the quality of your medical documentation is the primary factor in a favorable outcome. You can find more information on the Metairie hearing office page.

Other judges at this hearing office

The Social Security Administration assigns cases using a workload-balancing algorithm, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. There are 9 judges on record at this office since 2016. Approval rates across this bench vary significantly, ranging from 24% to 54% on a lifetime basis. You should prepare for your hearing with the understanding that your assigned judge's past performance is only one factor in your case.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions