SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Katherine Loo

Last decided San FranciscoSep 2025
Decisions 2,173since 2016

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review

Approval rates

Comparing a judge's performance requires looking at consistent data windows. Katherine Loo's 59% approval rate on record since 2016 sits within the 28% to 65% range observed among the 10 judges whose most recent office on record is the San Francisco hearing office. This comparison uses only since-2016 data to ensure accuracy. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for your individual hearing.

All decisions on record SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 59%
Decisions on record 2,173

SSA has not published a latest-period approval, fully favorable or denial breakdown for Judge Loo. The most recent period with decisions on record is September 26, 2025. Those rows are left out rather than estimated.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Loo's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Loo
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY25
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

Across 2,173 decisions on record since 2016, Katherine Loo has maintained a relatively steady approval pattern. While her annual approval rates have fluctuated—ranging from a low of 49% in 2021 to a high of 64% in 2024—the overall trend reflects a consistent approach to case evaluation. The most recent data from 2025 shows an approval rate of 63%, suggesting that her recent decisions remain aligned with her long-term average on record.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Loo's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the San Francisco hearing office

Katherine Loo's most recent office on record is the San Francisco hearing office, where her last recorded decision occurred in September 2025. This office serves the California region and is associated with a bench of 10 judges. You can expect a review of your medical evidence and vocational history at this office. You can see the San Francisco Hearing Office page for the full ALJ roster.

Other judges whose most recent office on record is San Francisco

The Social Security Administration uses a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. At the San Francisco hearing office, there are 10 judges whose most recent office on record is this location. Approval rates across this bench vary significantly, ranging from 28% to 65%. Your preparation remains the same regardless of which judge is assigned to your case.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
1×
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions