SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Robert E. Lowenstein

On record 720 decisions since 2016

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review

Approval rates

The approval rate for Robert E. Lowenstein is based on 720 lifetime decisions recorded between 2016 and 2018. This figure provides a statistical baseline when compared to the broader Los Angeles Downtown bench, where lifetime approval rates among judges range from 38% to 78%. Because the SSA assigns cases through a workload-balancing algorithm, your specific hearing outcome depends on the unique evidence in your file. These aggregate rates describe past decisions rather than predicting your individual hearing outcome.

Lifetime SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 78%
Decisions on record 720

SSA has not published a latest-period approval, fully favorable or denial breakdown for Judge Lowenstein. The most recent period with decisions on record is September 28, 2018. Those rows are left out rather than estimated.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Lowenstein's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Lowenstein
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY18
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

The record for Robert E. Lowenstein shows a consistent pattern of approvals, starting at 77% in 2016 and reaching 87% in 2018. With 720 total decisions on record, the data reflects a stable approach to evaluating your disability claim over the observed period. While the recent uptick in the final year of the data window suggests a shift, your case mix and evidence quality often drive these fluctuations. This trend provides a historical view of how the judge has approached cases since 2016.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Lowenstein's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Los Angeles Downtown hearing office

The Los Angeles Downtown hearing office serves you throughout the region, operating as a critical hub for SSDI adjudication in California. The office hosts a bench of 10 judges who manage a high volume of disability hearings. You can expect a formal proceeding where the focus remains on your medical evidence and vocational testimony. You can visit the Los Angeles Downtown Hearing Office page for the full ALJ roster.

Other judges at this hearing office

The Los Angeles Downtown hearing office currently maintains a bench of 10 judges on record since 2016, with 4 judges reporting in the most recent SSA period. Because the SSA uses a random assignment algorithm to balance workloads, you cannot choose your judge. Approval rates across this office vary significantly, spanning from 38% to 78% on a lifetime basis. You can find more information about the office's overall performance on the Los Angeles Downtown Hearing Office page.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions