SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Phillip C. Lyman

Last decided San JoseSep 2022
Decisions 2,090since 2016

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review

Approval rates

Comparing approval rates requires looking at data from the same timeframes to ensure accuracy. The 78% approval rate for Phillip C. Lyman reflects his entire record since 2016, which you can compare against the 51% to 78% range of other judges whose most recent office on record is San Jose. With 2,090 decisions on record, this data provides a stable view of past activity. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for your individual hearing.

All decisions on record SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 78%
Decisions on record 2,090

SSA has not published a latest-period approval, fully favorable or denial breakdown for Judge Lyman. The most recent period with decisions on record is September 30, 2022. Those rows are left out rather than estimated.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Lyman's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Lyman
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY22
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

The approval rate for Phillip C. Lyman has shown a generally upward trend across the 2,090 decisions on record since 2016. Starting at 59% in 2016, the rate reached 90% in 2020 before settling at 87% in 2022. This pattern reflects his decision-making over the recorded period.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Lyman's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the San Jose hearing office

Phillip C. Lyman's most recent office on record is the San Jose hearing office. This office maintains a bench of 10 judges whose most recent records are tied to this location. You can expect a formal hearing process focused on your medical documentation and vocational testimony.

Other judges whose most recent office on record is San Jose

The Social Security Administration uses a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. There are 10 judges whose most recent office on record is San Jose, and their approval rates since 2016 range from 51% to 78%. Because you cannot choose your judge, focusing on the strength of your medical evidence is the most effective way to prepare.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
1×
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions