SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Corinne T. McLaughlin

Last decided OaklandJul 2026
Decisions 2,666since 2017

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review

Approval rates

Comparing Corinne T. McLaughlin's approval rate to the broader bench provides context for your hearing. The 48% approval rate on record since 2017 sits within the 26% to 84% range observed among the 16 judges whose most recent office on record is the Oakland hearing office. Latest-period data shows a 48% approval rate, which is 18 points below the office-wide latest-period rate of 66%.

All decisions on record SSA records since 2017
Approval rate 48%
Decisions on record 2,666
Latest SSA reporting period July 31, 2026
Metric Judge McLaughlin Oakland National
Approval rate 48% 66% 58%
Fully favorable 40% — —
Denials 52% — —

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge McLaughlin's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge McLaughlin
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY18FY26
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

Since December 2017, Corinne T. McLaughlin has issued 2,666 decisions. The yearly approval trend shows fluctuations, with rates moving from 53% in 2018 to 39% in 2021, followed by 54% in 2024 and 55% in 2025. The 2026 fiscal year-to-date rate of 50% remains consistent with this recent activity.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge McLaughlin's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Oakland hearing office

Corinne T. McLaughlin's most recent office on record is the Oakland hearing office. This office maintains a bench of 16 judges whose most recent office on record is this location, with an office-wide latest-period approval rate of 66%. You can expect a standard hearing process focused on your medical evidence and vocational testimony.

Other judges whose most recent office on record is Oakland

The Social Security Administration uses a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. There are 16 judges whose most recent office on record is the Oakland hearing office. Approval rates across this bench vary significantly, ranging from 26% to 84% on their records since 2016.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
1×
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions