SSDI Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Corinne T. McLaughlin

SSDI Administrative Law Judge at the San Jose Hearing Office · 9 years on the bench · 15,172 lifetime decisions

Hearing scheduled with Judge McLaughlin?

Free Benefits Review →
Free
2 minutes
Confidential

Approval rates

Judge McLaughlin has served on the bench for 9 years, presiding over 15,172 lifetime decisions. Her latest reporting period shows an approval rate of 55%, which compares to the San Jose office average of 58% and the national average of 58%. These figures provide a statistical look at historical trends within her courtroom, though they do not predict your individual hearing outcome.

Metric Judge McLaughlin San Jose National
Approval rate 48% 58% 58%
Fully favorable 45%
Denials 45%

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge McLaughlin's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge McLaughlin
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY18FY25
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total dispositions excluding dismissals.

Decision pattern

Over her 9-year tenure, Judge McLaughlin has seen fluctuations in her approval rates, with a low point in 2021 followed by a recovery in recent years. The latest period approval rate of 55% suggests a continuation of the upward trend observed since 2022. This pattern indicates that the judge's approach to evidence and testimony has evolved over time, reflecting shifts in the types of cases heard or the quality of evidence presented.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge McLaughlin's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing with Judge McLaughlin? See if a free benefits review fits your case.

Free Benefits Review
Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the San Jose hearing office

The San Jose Hearing Office serves you across the California region, managing a high volume of disability cases. With a bench of 6 judges, the office maintains an office-wide latest approval rate of 58%. You can expect a rigorous review process focused on your medical documentation and vocational testimony. For more information, see the San Jose Hearing Office page for the full ALJ roster.

Other judges at this hearing office

The Social Security Administration uses a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning your assignment to Judge McLaughlin is essentially random. Across the San Jose Hearing Office, lifetime approval rates among the 6 judges range from 48% to 78%. Because of this variance, the judge you draw can influence the procedural flow of your hearing. You can find more information on the San Jose Hearing Office page.

Your odds change dramatically with a lawyer

SSDI hearing approval rates — represented vs. on your own

WITHOUT A LAWYER
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants
Free Benefits Review

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions