SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. William J. Mackowiak

On record 2,711 decisions since 2016

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review

Approval rates

The approval rate for William J. Mackowiak is based on 2,711 lifetime decisions recorded between 2016 and 2021. When evaluating this figure, consider that the Oak Brook hearing office bench features a wide range of lifetime approval rates, spanning from 35% to 84%. This variance highlights the importance of presenting a well-documented case regardless of your assigned judge. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for your individual hearing.

Lifetime SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 81%
Decisions on record 2,711

SSA has not published a latest-period approval, fully favorable or denial breakdown for Judge Mackowiak. The most recent period with decisions on record is September 24, 2021. Those rows are left out rather than estimated.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Mackowiak's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Mackowiak
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY21
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

The record for William J. Mackowiak shows a steady pattern of activity throughout the 2016 to 2021 window. While approval rates fluctuated year-over-year—ranging from a low of 69% in 2018 to a high of 89% in 2017—the overall volume of 2,711 lifetime decisions provides a stable view of his adjudication history. The most recent data from 2021 shows an approval rate of 88%. This trend suggests a consistent application of Social Security Administration standards over the observed period.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Mackowiak's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Oak Brook hearing office

The Oak Brook hearing office serves you throughout Illinois and is a key site for disability adjudications in the region. The office maintains a diverse bench of 10 judges on record, ensuring that cases are processed through a structured administrative system. You can expect a formal hearing environment where medical documentation and vocational testimony are prioritized. You can see the Oak Brook Hearing Office page for the full ALJ roster.

Other judges at this hearing office

The Social Security Administration utilizes a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning your assignment to a specific judge is essentially random. There are 10 judges on record at the Oak Brook hearing office since 2016, with a wide range of lifetime approval rates from 35% to 84%. Because you cannot choose your judge, focusing on the strength of your medical evidence is the most effective way to prepare.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions