SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Ann F. MacMurray

Position Administrative Law Judge
On record SSA records since 2016
Decisions 678 lifetime

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review
Free
2 minutes
Confidential

Approval rates

Comparing a judge's performance requires looking at consistent data sets. At the Colorado Springs hearing office, the lifetime approval rates for judges on record range from 21% to 74%. This variation highlights why understanding the local bench is important for your claim. With 678 decisions on record, the data provides a stable view of past outcomes. These aggregate rates describe past decisions rather than predicting your specific hearing outcome.

Lifetime SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 53%
Decisions on record 678

SSA has not published a latest-period approval, fully favorable or denial breakdown for Judge MacMurray. The most recent period with decisions on record is September 28, 2018. Those rows are left out rather than estimated.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge MacMurray's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge MacMurray
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY18
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

The record for Ann F. MacMurray spans from 2016 to 2018, covering 678 total decisions. Her yearly trend shows a shift in approval frequency, moving from 70% in 2016 to 44% by 2018. This trend suggests that her recent decisions became more selective, which may reflect changes in the complexity of cases or the quality of evidence presented. Understanding this pattern helps you prepare a more robust case file.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge MacMurray's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Colorado Springs hearing office

The Colorado Springs hearing office serves claimants throughout the region, maintaining a bench of 10 judges on record. The office-wide latest-period approval rate is 34%, providing a baseline for local proceedings. You can expect a formal environment where medical documentation and vocational testimony are prioritized. For more information on the local judiciary, see the Colorado Springs Hearing Office page for the full ALJ roster.

Other judges at this hearing office

The Social Security Administration utilizes a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning your assignment to a specific judge is essentially random. There are 10 judges on record at this office since 2016, 4 of whom are reported in the latest period. With lifetime approval rates across the bench ranging from 21% to 74%, the judge you draw can influence the hearing process. You can find more information on the Colorado Springs Hearing Office page.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions