SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Michelle S. Marcus

Position Administrative Law Judge
On record SSA records since 2016
Decisions 1,903 lifetime

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review
Free
2 minutes
Confidential

Approval rates

The approval rates for Michelle S. Marcus reflect a substantial body of work, providing a stable view of her decision history. When comparing her latest-period performance to the broader Albany office, she currently tracks 5 points lower than the office-wide latest-period average of 61%. These figures are derived from 1,903 lifetime decisions, ensuring a statistically significant sample size. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for individual hearings.

Lifetime SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 69%
Decisions on record 1,903
Latest SSA reporting period July 31, 2026
Metric Judge Marcus Albany National
Approval rate 56% 61% 58%
Fully favorable 43%
Denials 44%

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Marcus's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Marcus
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY26
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total dispositions excluding dismissals.

Decision pattern

Since 2016, your approval record for Michelle S. Marcus has shown notable fluctuations, moving from 68% in 2016 to a peak of 78% in 2024 before shifting to 56% in the most recent period. With 1,903 total decisions on record, the data indicates a judge who has navigated various shifts in case volume and complexity. The recent decline in the approval rate reflects the evolving nature of the current docket.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Marcus's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Albany hearing office

The Albany hearing office serves you throughout the region, operating as a critical hub for SSDI hearings in New York. With 15 judges on record, the office maintains an office-wide latest-period approval rate of 61%. You can expect a formal process focused on the medical and vocational evidence presented in your file. You can see the Albany hearing office page for the full ALJ roster.

Other judges at this hearing office

The Albany hearing office utilizes a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning you cannot request a specific judge. This office features 15 judges on record since 2016, with 8 currently reporting in the latest SSA data. The lifetime approval rates across this bench range from 41% to 81%, highlighting the diversity of decision patterns you might encounter. The guidance for your preparation remains consistent regardless of which judge you are assigned.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions