SSDI Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Jay Marku

SSDI Administrative Law Judge at the Elkins Park Hearing Office · 4 years on the bench · 11,125 lifetime decisions

Hearing scheduled with Judge Marku?

Free Benefits Review →
Free
2 minutes
Confidential

Approval rates

When evaluating your case, it is helpful to look at how a judge's approval rate compares to broader benchmarks. Judge Marku has maintained a lifetime approval rate of 46%, which currently trends 14 percentage points below the Elkins Park Hearing Office average of 60%. These figures are derived from a docket of 11,125 lifetime decisions. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for individual hearings.

Metric Judge Marku Elkins Park National
Approval rate 46% 60% 58%
Fully favorable 39%
Denials 54%

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Marku's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Marku
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY19
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total dispositions excluding dismissals.

Decision pattern

Over a 4-year tenure, Judge Marku has shown a consistent decision-making pattern. Starting with a 47% approval rate in 2016, the data indicates a shift to 44% by 2019. This trend suggests a steady approach to case evaluation throughout their time on the bench. Understanding this history helps you and your representative focus on the evidence quality required for your specific claim.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Marku's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing with Judge Marku? Free, confidential — see if you qualify for SSDI.

Free Benefits Review
Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Elkins Park hearing office

The Elkins Park Hearing Office serves a wide population across Pennsylvania, managing a high volume of disability claims. With a bench of 6 judges, the office maintains an approval rate that reflects the complex nature of the cases heard in this region. You should be prepared for a rigorous review of medical and vocational evidence. You can see the Elkins Park Hearing Office page for the full ALJ roster.

Other judges at this hearing office

The Social Security Administration utilizes a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning your assignment to a specific judge is essentially random. Within the Elkins Park Hearing Office, approval rates among the bench vary, ranging from 46% to 71%. This diversity in decision-making underscores why your case presentation is vital. The guidance for your preparation remains consistent regardless of which judge you are assigned.

Your odds change dramatically with a lawyer

SSDI hearing approval rates — represented vs. on your own

WITHOUT A LAWYER
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants
Free Benefits Review

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions