SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Denise M. Martin

Last decided NHC ChicagoSep 2025
Decisions 2,792since 2016

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review

Approval rates

This table displays the approval rate for Denise M. Martin based on her 2,792 decisions on record since 2016. By comparing this figure against the 26% to 63% range of other judges whose most recent office on record is NHC Chicago, you can see how your case aligns with the broader bench. These statistics are derived from a large volume of cases to ensure statistical confidence.

All decisions on record SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 53%
Decisions on record 2,792

Judge Martin is not in SSA's latest disposition file, so there is no 12-month figure. The most recent period with decisions on record is September 26, 2025. Those rows are left out rather than estimated.

Judge Martin isn't in SSA's latest disposition file, so the judge comparison tool, which compares active judges over the same 12 months, leaves them out.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Martin's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Martin
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY25
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

Since 2016, Denise M. Martin has maintained an approval rate of 53% across 2,792 decisions. The yearly trend shows fluctuation, with rates peaking in 2018 before shifting through 2021. The most recent data from 2025 shows a 76% approval rate, though this is based on a smaller volume of 17 decisions.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Martin's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the NHC Chicago hearing office

NHC Chicago serves you across the Illinois region. This office has a bench of 19 judges whose most recent office on record is this location. You can expect a standard hearing process where the focus remains on the medical evidence and vocational factors of your specific claim.

Other judges whose most recent office on record is NHC Chicago

The Social Security Administration uses a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. Among the 19 judges whose most recent office on record is NHC Chicago, approval rates vary significantly, ranging from 26% to 63% based on their records since 2016.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
1×
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions