SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Lisa B. Martin

Last decided SacramentoJul 2026
Decisions 3,874since 2016

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review

Approval rates

When evaluating your hearing, it is helpful to compare a judge's performance against the broader bench. Lisa B. Martin has an approval rate of 57% across 3,874 decisions on record since 2016. This figure sits within the 39% to 80% range observed among the 20 judges whose most recent office on record is the Sacramento hearing office.

All decisions on record SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 57%
Decisions on record 3,874
Latest SSA reporting period July 31, 2026
Metric Judge Martin Sacramento National
Approval rate 69% 68% 58%
Fully favorable 52% — —
Denials 31% — —

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Martin's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Martin
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY26
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

The approval rate for Lisa B. Martin has shifted over time. While the rate remained between 51% and 58% from 2016 through 2023, the data shows an upward trend, with approval rates reaching 68% in 2024, 64% in 2025, and 69% in the partial 2026 fiscal year. These fluctuations reflect changes in case mix and evidence quality over the years.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Martin's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Sacramento hearing office

The Sacramento hearing office is the most recent office on record for Lisa B. Martin as of July 2026. This office is supported by a bench of 20 judges whose most recent office on record is this location. In the latest reporting period, the office maintained an approval rate of 68%.

Other judges whose most recent office on record is Sacramento

The Social Security Administration uses a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. There are 20 judges whose most recent office on record is the Sacramento hearing office. Approval rates among this group vary significantly, ranging from 39% to 80% on their since-2016 records.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
1×
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions