SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Shirley A. Marzan

Last decided Tampa OHOJul 2026
Decisions 3,134since 2016

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review

Approval rates

Comparing approval rates requires looking at data from the same timeframe. While Shirley A. Marzan maintains a 61% approval rate across her record since 2016, her latest-period approval rate of 60% compares to the Tampa OHO latest-period average of 59%. With 3,134 decisions on record, the data provides a clear view of historical trends. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for your individual hearing.

All decisions on record SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 61%
Decisions on record 3,134
Latest SSA reporting period July 31, 2026
Metric Judge Marzan Tampa OHO National
Approval rate 60% 59% 58%
Fully favorable 52% — —
Denials 40% — —

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Marzan's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Marzan
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY17FY26
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

Since 2016, Shirley A. Marzan has issued 3,134 decisions. The yearly trend shows fluctuations, with approval rates reaching 72% in 2022. The 2026 fiscal year-to-date approval rate of 60% remains consistent with the broader historical average. This latest period reflects a continuation of a steady pattern in case outcomes.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Marzan's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Tampa OHO hearing office

Shirley A. Marzan's most recent office on record is the Tampa OHO, which serves you in Florida. This office maintains a latest-period approval rate of 59%, reflecting the broader environment for disability claims in the region. You can expect a review of your medical evidence regardless of the specific judge assigned to your hearing.

Other judges whose most recent office on record is Tampa OHO

The Social Security Administration assigns cases using a workload-balancing algorithm, meaning the judge you are assigned is random. There are 16 judges whose most recent office on record is the Tampa OHO, and 11 of them decided cases here in the latest file through July 2026. Approval rates across this bench range from 31% to 90% on their since-2016 records. Your preparation remains the same regardless of which judge is assigned to your case.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
1×
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions