SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Shannon Mashburn

Last decided TupeloJul 2026
Decisions 3,416since 2016

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review

Approval rates

To understand how Shannon Mashburn compares to the broader bench, we look at approval rates across the same reporting periods. While the overall approval rate since 2016 is 65%, recent data shows a 74% approval rate in the latest reporting period. This latest-period figure sits 6 points above the 68% office average, 19 points above the 55% state average, and 16 points above the 58% national average.

All decisions on record SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 65%
Decisions on record 3,416
Latest SSA reporting period July 31, 2026
Metric Judge Mashburn Tupelo National
Approval rate 74% 68% 58%
Fully favorable 65% — —
Denials 26% — —

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Mashburn's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Mashburn
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY17FY26
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

The approval rate for Shannon Mashburn has fluctuated since 2016, starting at 77% in 2017 before trending through a period of lower rates between 2018 and 2022. More recently, the approval rate has risen to 74% in the latest partial 2026 period. This recent performance reflects a shift compared to the earlier record.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Mashburn's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Tupelo hearing office

The Tupelo hearing office is the most recent office on record for 7 judges, with an office-wide latest-period approval rate of 68%. You can expect a standard administrative hearing process focused on your medical and vocational evidence.

Other judges whose most recent office on record is Tupelo

The Social Security Administration uses a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. There are 7 judges whose most recent office on record is this one, and their approval rates range from 19% to 66% based on their records since 2016.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
1×
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions