SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Andrea McBarnette

Last decided BaltimoreSep 2016
Decisions 189since 2016

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review

Approval rates

The approval rate for Andrea McBarnette is based on 189 decisions on record since 2016. This figure provides a probability cloud from past decisions, which can be compared against the 32% to 79% range seen among the 24 judges whose most recent office on record is the Baltimore hearing office. These statistics rely on a docket deep enough for the pattern to be stable. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for your individual hearing.

All decisions on record SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 56%
Decisions on record 189

SSA has not published a latest-period approval, fully favorable or denial breakdown for Judge McBarnette. The most recent period with decisions on record is September 30, 2016. Those rows are left out rather than estimated.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge McBarnette's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge McBarnette
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

Since 2016, Andrea McBarnette has maintained an approval rate of 56% across 189 decisions on record. The data shows a steady pattern throughout the recorded period. Because case assignment is determined by an SSA workload-balancing algorithm, the specific judge you are assigned is essentially random. Understanding this pattern helps you prepare for the hearing process.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge McBarnette's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Baltimore hearing office

Andrea McBarnette's most recent office on record is the Baltimore hearing office, which serves the Maryland region. This office is home to 24 judges whose most recent office on record is this location. You can expect a standard hearing process where the quality of medical evidence is the primary factor in the outcome.

Other judges whose most recent office on record is Baltimore

SSA assigns cases using a workload-balancing algorithm, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. There are 24 judges whose most recent office on record is the Baltimore hearing office, with approval rates ranging from 32% to 79% on their since-2016 records. While these figures provide context for the office, your preparation should focus on the specific evidence in your claim.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
1×
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions