SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Melissa J. McIntosh

Last decided Tampa OHOJul 2026
Decisions 2,680since 2016

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review

Approval rates

Comparing approval rates requires looking at consistent timeframes. Melissa J. McIntosh maintains a 65% approval rate across her record since 2016, which sits within the 31% to 90% range of other judges at the Tampa OHO. In the most recent reporting period, her 69% approval rate outperformed the office average of 59% by 10 percentage points. These figures are based on a substantial volume of decisions, providing a clear view of past trends.

All decisions on record SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 65%
Decisions on record 2,680
Latest SSA reporting period July 31, 2026
Metric Judge McIntosh Tampa OHO National
Approval rate 69% 59% 58%
Fully favorable 59% — —
Denials 31% — —

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge McIntosh's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge McIntosh
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY17FY26
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

Since 2016, the approval rate for Melissa J. McIntosh has shown a varied trend. After an initial 67% approval rate in 2017, the figures fluctuated, reaching a high of 81% in 2021 before stabilizing in recent years. With 2,680 total decisions on record, the data reflects a consistent approach to evaluating disability claims. The latest period approval rate of 69% remains slightly above her long-term average, suggesting a continuation of her established decision-making pattern.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge McIntosh's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Tampa OHO hearing office

The Tampa OHO is the most recent office on record for Melissa J. McIntosh, with her last recorded decision there in July 2026. This office serves claimants across Florida and maintains a bench of 16 judges. The office-wide approval rate in the latest period was 59%, which provides a baseline for the region. You can see the Tampa OHO Hearing Office page for the full ALJ roster.

Other judges whose most recent office on record is Tampa OHO

The Social Security Administration uses a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. There are 16 judges whose most recent office on record is the Tampa OHO, and 11 of them decided cases here in the latest file from July 2026. Approval rates across this bench vary significantly, ranging from 31% to 90% since 2016. For preparation purposes, the guidance is the same regardless of which judge you are assigned.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
1×
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions