SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Bernard J. McKay

Position Administrative Law Judge
On record SSA records since 2016
Decisions 4,139 lifetime

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review
Free
2 minutes
Confidential

Approval rates

Comparing approval rates requires looking at consistent timeframes. Bernard J. McKay's lifetime approval rate of 47% sits within the broader San Antonio office range of 18% to 70%. In the most recent reporting period, his 57% approval rate outperformed the office-wide 52% average by 5 percentage points. These figures are derived from a docket of 4,139 lifetime decisions. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for individual hearings.

Lifetime SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 47%
Decisions on record 4,139
Latest SSA reporting period July 31, 2026
Metric Judge McKay San Antonio National
Approval rate 57% 52% 58%
Fully favorable 41%
Denials 43%

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge McKay's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge McKay
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY26
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total dispositions excluding dismissals.

Decision pattern

Since 2016, Bernard J. McKay's approval rate has shown an upward trend. After hovering in the low 40s during the 2019-2021 period, the rate reached 57% in the most recent reporting cycle. This shift marks a departure from earlier decision patterns. The latest period reflects a continuation of this recent trajectory, which may be influenced by changes in the types of cases heard or the quality of evidence presented.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge McKay's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the San Antonio hearing office

The San Antonio hearing office serves applicants throughout the region, maintaining a bench of 23 judges on record. The office-wide approval rate in the latest period was 52%, reflecting the collective workload of the 17 active judges currently reporting. You can expect a standard administrative process focused on the evaluation of medical and vocational evidence. You can see the San Antonio Hearing Office page for the full ALJ roster.

Other judges at this hearing office

The Social Security Administration assigns cases using a workload-balancing algorithm, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. There are 23 judges on record at this office since 2016, 17 of whom reported in the latest period. Approval rates across this bench vary significantly, ranging from 18% to 70% lifetime. For preparation purposes, the guidance is the same regardless of which judge you are assigned.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions