SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Bernard J. McKay

Last decided San AntonioJul 2026
Decisions 4,139since 2016

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review

Approval rates

Comparing approval rates requires looking at consistent data windows. While the 47% rate covers all decisions since 2016, recent performance shows a 57% approval rate in the latest reporting period. This latest-period figure sits 5 percentage points above the San Antonio office average of 52%. With 4,139 decisions on record, the data provides a clear view of historical patterns.

All decisions on record SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 47%
Decisions on record 4,139
Latest SSA reporting period July 31, 2026
Metric Judge McKay San Antonio National
Approval rate 57% 52% 58%
Fully favorable 41% — —
Denials 43% — —

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge McKay's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge McKay
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY26
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

The approval rate for Bernard J. McKay has shifted since 2016. After fluctuating in the middle years of the record, the rate reached 57% in the latest period. This latest-period performance is higher than the long-term average of 47%. The data reflects a pattern that has become more favorable in recent years, though the latest period represents a partial fiscal year.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge McKay's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the San Antonio hearing office

The San Antonio hearing office serves claimants across the region and maintains a bench of 23 judges. In the latest reporting period, the office-wide approval rate was 52%. You can expect a standard hearing process focused on the medical and vocational evidence presented in your file.

Other judges whose most recent office on record is San Antonio

The Social Security Administration uses a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning your assignment to a specific judge is essentially random. At the San Antonio hearing office, there are 23 judges whose most recent office on record is this one. Approval rates across this bench vary significantly, ranging from 18% to 70% on their since-2016 records.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
1×
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions