SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Theresa Merrill

Last decided NewarkJul 2026
Decisions 2,964since 2016

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review

Approval rates

Comparing performance requires looking at consistent data windows. Her 73% approval rate since 2016 sits at the top of the range for the Newark bench, which spans from 20% to 73% for judges with records in this same timeframe. In the most recent reporting period, her 78% approval rate outperformed the Newark office average of 55%. These figures are derived from a volume of 2,964 decisions on record. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for your individual hearing.

All decisions on record SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 73%
Decisions on record 2,964
Latest SSA reporting period July 31, 2026
Metric Judge Merrill Newark National
Approval rate 78% 55% 58%
Fully favorable 74% — —
Denials 22% — —

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Merrill's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Merrill
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY26
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

Since January 2016, your judge's approval rate has fluctuated, peaking at 84% in 2019. After a period of lower approval rates around 2021 and 2024, the most recent data indicates a return to higher approval levels, with a 78% rate recorded in the partial 2026 fiscal year. This recent trend reflects a return toward her historical average. These patterns help illustrate how case outcomes have evolved over the last decade.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Merrill's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Newark hearing office

The Newark hearing office serves you and other claimants throughout the region, operating as a hub for disability adjudications in New Jersey. With 17 judges whose most recent office on record is this location, the office maintains a diverse bench with varying approval patterns. The office-wide approval rate in the latest period was 55%, providing a benchmark for the local hearing environment.

Other judges whose most recent office on record is Newark

The Social Security Administration uses a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. There are 17 judges whose most recent office on record is the Newark office, 10 of whom decided cases in the latest SSA file. Approval rates among this group vary widely, ranging from 20% to 73% on their records since 2016. Your preparation remains the same regardless of which judge you are assigned.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
1×
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions