SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Shirley M. Michaelson

Last decided EvanstonSep 2017
Decisions 358since 2016

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review

Approval rates

The 72% approval rate for Shirley M. Michaelson reflects all decisions on record since 2016. This is compared against the 45% to 79% range observed among the 15 judges whose most recent office on record is Evanston. These figures provide a statistical baseline for understanding how different judges have historically approached disability claims.

All decisions on record SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 72%
Decisions on record 358

SSA has not published a latest-period approval, fully favorable or denial breakdown for Judge Michaelson. The most recent period with decisions on record is September 29, 2017. Those rows are left out rather than estimated.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Michaelson's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Michaelson
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY17
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

The approval rate for Shirley M. Michaelson has remained consistent across the 358 decisions on record since 2016. Yearly data shows a 72% approval rate in 2016 followed by 70% in 2017. This steady pattern suggests a stable approach to evaluating evidence and medical documentation over the recorded period.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Michaelson's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Evanston hearing office

The Evanston hearing office is the most recent office on record for 15 judges as of September 2017. The office manages a diverse caseload of disability claims, and you can expect a formal administrative process focused on the medical and vocational evidence presented in your file.

Other judges whose most recent office on record is Evanston

The Social Security Administration uses a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. There are 15 judges whose most recent office on record is Evanston, with approval rates ranging from 45% to 79% on their since-2016 records. Because each judge has a unique approach to evidence, understanding the broader bench helps you prepare for the hearing process.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
1×
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions