Matt Midles is an SSA Administrative Law Judge at the San Francisco hearing office. Across the 1,053 decisions on record since 2023, 55% have been approved. The office's judges range from 28% to 65% on their lifetime records, and case assignment is random, so the judge you draw matters. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for your individual hearing. An attorney can help you prepare for this judge's specific bench.
This page presents publicly available SSA Office of Hearings Operations disposition data, with no editorial rating or evaluation. ALJs are independent decisionmakers; aggregate statistics describe past patterns, not predictions of how any individual case will be decided. Information here is provided for hearing preparation, not as legal advice.
Approval rates
Comparing approval rates requires looking at data from the same timeframes. While Matt Midles has a lifetime approval rate of 55%, his most recent reporting period shows an approval rate of 45%, which sits 1 percentage point below the San Francisco office average of 46%. These figures are derived from a volume of 1,053 lifetime decisions. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for your individual hearing.
Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.
Approval rate over time
Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Midles's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.
Decision pattern
The record for Matt Midles spans from 2023 to 2026, covering 1,053 total decisions. His approval trend has shown a shift, moving from 62% in 2023 to 45% in the most recent reporting period. This decline reflects a change in the frequency of favorable outcomes compared to his earlier activity on the bench. The latest period indicates a departure from his historical average, which may be influenced by shifts in case complexity or the evidence presented in recent hearings.
Preparing for an SSDI hearing
The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Midles's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.
- Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
- Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
- Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
- Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.
About the San Francisco hearing office
The San Francisco hearing office serves you throughout the California region. With a bench of 10 judges on record, this office manages a diverse caseload of disability applications. The office-wide latest-period approval rate is 46%, providing a local benchmark for hearing outcomes. You can see the San Francisco Hearing Office page for the full ALJ roster.
Other judges at this hearing office
The Social Security Administration utilizes a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. There are 10 judges on record at this office since 2016, 5 of whom are reported in the latest SSA file. Approval rates across this bench vary significantly, with lifetime records ranging from 28% to 65%.
Approval rates change with a lawyer
Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.
Frequently asked questions
Matt Midles has a lifetime approval rate of 55%, which sits within the broader office range of 28% to 65%. While his latest-period approval rate of 45% is slightly below the office average of 46%, your individual case outcome depends heavily on your medical evidence. An attorney can help you prepare your case to meet the specific standards of this hearing office.
Yes, the data shows a trend from 62% approval in 2023 to 45% in 2026. This shift represents a change in the rate of favorable decisions over the last few years. If you are concerned about how these trends might affect your hearing, an attorney can help you evaluate your case strategy.
No, you cannot request a specific judge. The Social Security Administration assigns cases using a workload-balancing algorithm to ensure efficiency. Because you cannot choose your judge, it is important to be prepared for any ALJ by having your medical documentation organized with professional assistance.
An SSDI hearing is a formal but non-adversarial proceeding where an ALJ reviews your medical evidence and testimony. You will likely be asked questions about your work history and physical or mental limitations. Working with an attorney can help you prepare for these questions and ensure your evidence is presented clearly.
A judge's approval rate is a reflection of past decisions and does not predict the outcome of your specific hearing. Every case is unique, and the strength of your medical evidence is the most important factor in a favorable decision. An attorney can help you assess your case and prepare for your hearing before Matt Midles.



