SSDI Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Vivian W. Mittleman

SSDI Administrative Law Judge at the Baltimore Hearing Office · 1 years on the bench · 1,144 lifetime decisions

Hearing scheduled with Judge Mittleman?

Free Benefits Review →
Free
2 minutes
Confidential

Approval rates

When evaluating your claim, it is helpful to look at how your judge's approval rate compares to broader benchmarks. Her lifetime rate of 69% is 11 percentage points higher than the national average and 10 percentage points above the state average. These figures are derived from a docket of 1,144 lifetime decisions. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for your individual hearing.

Metric Judge Mittleman Baltimore National
Approval rate 69% 66% 58%
Fully favorable 59%
Denials 31%

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Mittleman's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Mittleman
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total dispositions excluding dismissals.

Decision pattern

Over her 1 year on the bench, your judge has maintained a consistent approach to disability claims. Her approval rate of 69% reflects a steady pattern of adjudication. While recent data shows her performing slightly above the local office average, this trend suggests consistency in how she evaluates evidence. This pattern indicates that your judge's approach to case requirements remains predictable.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Mittleman's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing with Judge Mittleman? Free, confidential — see if you qualify for SSDI.

Free Benefits Review
Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Baltimore hearing office

The Baltimore Hearing Office serves a large population across Maryland, managing a high volume of SSDI claims with a team of 6 administrative law judges. The office currently reports an average approval rate of 66%. You should be prepared for a thorough review of your medical records and vocational history. You can see the Baltimore Hearing Office page for the full ALJ roster.

Other judges at this hearing office

The Social Security Administration uses a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. Within the Baltimore Hearing Office, the bench features a range of approval rates, spanning from 46% to 81% across the 6 judges. Because your assignment is outside of your control, focusing on the quality of your medical evidence is the most effective way to prepare.

Your odds change dramatically with a lawyer

SSDI hearing approval rates — represented vs. on your own

WITHOUT A LAWYER
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants
Free Benefits Review

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions