SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Vivian W. Mittleman

Position Administrative Law Judge
On record SSA records since 2016
Decisions 154 lifetime

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review
Free
2 minutes
Confidential

Approval rates

The approval rate for Vivian W. Mittleman is based on 154 lifetime decisions recorded since 2016. This figure provides a baseline for understanding how cases have been decided in her courtroom compared to the 32% to 79% range seen across the Baltimore bench. While these statistics offer insight into past trends, they do not guarantee a specific outcome for your claim. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for your individual hearing.

Lifetime SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 68%
Decisions on record 154

SSA has not published a latest-period approval, fully favorable or denial breakdown for Judge Mittleman. The most recent period with decisions on record is September 30, 2016. Those rows are left out rather than estimated.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Mittleman's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Mittleman
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total dispositions excluding dismissals.

Decision pattern

The record for Vivian W. Mittleman spans from 2016 to 2016, during which she issued 154 decisions. Her lifetime approval rate of 68% reflects the outcomes of these cases. Because her data window is concentrated, the rate provides a snapshot of her decision-making during that period. This pattern remains a point of reference for understanding the consistency of her rulings over time.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Mittleman's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Baltimore hearing office

The Baltimore hearing office serves claimants throughout the region, maintaining a diverse bench of 26 judges on record. You can expect a standard administrative process focused on the medical and vocational evidence presented in your file. The office-wide latest-period approval rate is 60%. For more information, see the Baltimore Hearing Office page for the full ALJ roster.

Other judges at this hearing office

The Social Security Administration assigns cases through a workload-balancing algorithm, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. There are 26 judges on record at this office since 2016, 10 of whom reported in the latest period. Approval rates across this bench vary significantly, ranging from 32% to 79% lifetime. For preparation purposes, the guidance is the same regardless of which judge you are assigned.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions