SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Gordan Momcilovic

Last decided San AntonioJul 2026
Decisions 3,913since 2016

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review

Approval rates

The approval rate for Gordan Momcilovic is based on 3,913 decisions on record since 2016. When comparing this to the broader bench, the judge's record falls within the 18% to 70% range observed among the 23 judges whose most recent office on record is the San Antonio hearing office. In the most recent reporting period, the judge's 17% approval rate contrasts with the 52% office-wide average. These figures reflect historical patterns rather than specific predictions for your hearing.

All decisions on record SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 20%
Decisions on record 3,913
Latest SSA reporting period July 31, 2026
Metric Judge Momcilovic San Antonio National
Approval rate 17% 52% 58%
Fully favorable 14% — —
Denials 83% — —

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Momcilovic's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Momcilovic
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY26
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

Since 2016, the approval rate for Gordan Momcilovic has fluctuated, starting at 34% and reaching 17% in the most recent fiscal year to date. With 3,913 total decisions on record, the data reflects a consistent volume of activity over the past decade. These shifts often correlate with changes in case complexity or the specific evidence presented in your hearing.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Momcilovic's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the San Antonio hearing office

The San Antonio hearing office maintains a bench of 23 judges whose most recent office on record is this location. The office-wide approval rate for the latest period stands at 52%. You can see the San Antonio hearing office page for the full roster of judges.

Other judges whose most recent office on record is San Antonio

The Social Security Administration uses a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning your judge assignment is random. There are 23 judges whose most recent office on record is the San Antonio hearing office, 17 of whom decided cases in the latest file through July 2026. Approval rates across this bench vary significantly, ranging from 18% to 70% on their since-2016 records.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
1×
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions