SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Gordan Momcilovic

Position Administrative Law Judge
On record SSA records since 2016
Decisions 3,913 lifetime

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review
Free
2 minutes
Confidential

Approval rates

The approval rates for Gordan Momcilovic are based on 3,913 lifetime decisions. When comparing his latest-period approval rate of 17% against the San Antonio office average of 52%, it is clear that individual judge patterns vary significantly. The office-wide lifetime approval range spans from 18% to 70%, highlighting the importance of understanding your specific judge's history. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for individual hearings.

Lifetime SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 20%
Decisions on record 3,913
Latest SSA reporting period July 31, 2026
Metric Judge Momcilovic San Antonio National
Approval rate 17% 52% 58%
Fully favorable 14%
Denials 83%

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Momcilovic's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Momcilovic
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY26
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

Since 2016, Gordan Momcilovic has maintained a consistent decision pattern across his 3,913 lifetime decisions. The yearly trend shows fluctuations, with approval rates moving from 34% in 2016 to 17% in 2026. This latest-period rate of 17% is 35 points lower than the office-wide latest-period average of 52%. These trends reflect the ongoing evolution of case outcomes, and the latest period continues to show a distinct pattern compared to the broader office bench.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Momcilovic's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the San Antonio hearing office

The San Antonio hearing office serves a significant population in Texas and is part of a busy regional network. With 23 judges on record, the office maintains an office-wide latest-period approval rate of 52%. You should be prepared for a thorough review of your medical evidence and vocational history. You can see the San Antonio Hearing Office page for the full ALJ roster.

Other judges at this hearing office

The Social Security Administration uses a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning your assignment to Gordan Momcilovic is essentially random. There are 23 judges on record at this office since 2016, 17 of whom reported in the latest period. With an office-wide lifetime approval-rate range of 18% to 70%, the judge you draw can have a meaningful impact on your case. For preparation purposes, the guidance is the same regardless of which judge you are assigned.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions