SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Jeffery D. Morgan

Last decided New OrleansJul 2026
Decisions 3,415since 2016

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review

Approval rates

The approval rates for Jeffery D. Morgan are calculated based on his total decisions on record since 2016. When comparing his performance to the local bench, the range of approval rates among the 17 judges whose most recent office on record is the New Orleans hearing office spans from 38% to 85%. These figures provide a statistical baseline for the office. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for your individual hearing.

All decisions on record SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 38%
Decisions on record 3,415
Latest SSA reporting period July 31, 2026
Metric Judge Morgan New Orleans National
Approval rate 46% 49% 58%
Fully favorable 30% — —
Denials 54% — —

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Morgan's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Morgan
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY26
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

Since 2016, your judge's approval rate has shown a varied trend, beginning at 28% and reaching 46% in the most recent partial fiscal year. With 3,415 decisions on record, the data reflects a pattern that has fluctuated over the last decade. While the latest reporting period shows a 46% approval rate, this is a snapshot of recent activity. This recent uptick may reflect changes in case mix or evidence quality.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Morgan's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the New Orleans hearing office

The most recent office on record for Jeffery D. Morgan is the New Orleans hearing office, with the last recorded decision dated July 2026. This office serves claimants across the region and maintains a bench of 17 judges. The office-wide approval rate in the latest reporting period was 49%. You can see the New Orleans hearing office page for the full ALJ roster.

Other judges whose most recent office on record is New Orleans

The Social Security Administration uses a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. There are 17 judges whose most recent office on record is the New Orleans hearing office, and 6 of them decided cases in the latest file from July 2026. Approval rates across this bench vary significantly, ranging from 38% to 85%.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
1×
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions