SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Jeffery D. Morgan

Position Administrative Law Judge
On record SSA records since 2016
Decisions 3,415 lifetime

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review
Free
2 minutes
Confidential

Approval rates

The approval rates for Jeffery D. Morgan reflect a career-long record of 38% across 3,415 decisions. When evaluating these figures, compare the lifetime performance against the broader office-wide lifetime range of 38% to 85%. In the most recent reporting period, the 46% approval rate can be measured against the New Orleans office average of 49%. These aggregate rates describe past decisions rather than predicting your specific outcome.

Lifetime SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 38%
Decisions on record 3,415
Latest SSA reporting period July 31, 2026
Metric Judge Morgan New Orleans National
Approval rate 46% 49% 58%
Fully favorable 30%
Denials 54%

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Morgan's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Morgan
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY26
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

Since 2016, Jeffery D. Morgan has maintained a consistent docket with 3,415 total decisions on record. The yearly trend shows a variation in approval rates, moving from 28% in 2016 to 46% in the most recent reporting period. These trends provide insight into how claims have been historically processed, though your case remains unique.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Morgan's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the New Orleans hearing office

The New Orleans hearing office serves you throughout Louisiana and the surrounding region. This office features a bench of 17 judges on record, with an office-wide latest-period approval rate of 49%. You can expect a formal process focused on the medical and vocational evidence presented in your file. See the New Orleans Hearing Office page for the full ALJ roster.

Other judges at this hearing office

The Social Security Administration uses a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning your assignment to a specific judge is essentially random. There are 17 judges on record at the New Orleans office since 2016, 6 of whom reported data in the latest period. Approval rates among these peers vary significantly, ranging from 38% to 85% over their respective lifetimes.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions