SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Vadim Mozyrsky

Position Administrative Law Judge
On record SSA records since 2016
Decisions 3,125 lifetime

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review
Free
2 minutes
Confidential

Approval rates

Comparing performance requires looking at consistent timeframes. While Vadim Mozyrsky has a 42% lifetime approval rate, his latest-period approval rate is 49%. This sits against an office-wide latest-period rate of 64%, a state-wide rate of 61%, and a national average of 58%. These figures are derived from thousands of cases, providing a statistical baseline for your expectations.

Lifetime SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 42%
Decisions on record 3,125
Latest SSA reporting period July 31, 2026
Metric Judge Mozyrsky Portland OR National
Approval rate 49% 64% 58%
Fully favorable 46%
Denials 51%

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Mozyrsky's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Mozyrsky
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY26
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

Since 2016, Vadim Mozyrsky has presided over 3,125 lifetime decisions. His approval rate has fluctuated over the years, showing a rise in 2020 and 2024 before settling into the current 49% range in the latest reporting period. This trend suggests a dynamic approach to evidence evaluation. The recent figures reflect a continuation of this varied pattern, which is common as case types and medical evidence requirements evolve.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Mozyrsky's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Portland OR hearing office

The Portland OR hearing office serves you throughout the region, managing a diverse caseload of SSDI and SSI applications. With 12 judges on record, the office maintains a latest-period approval rate of 64%. You can expect a formal hearing process where your medical documentation and vocational testimony are central to the outcome. You can find more information on the Portland OR Hearing Office page.

Other judges at this hearing office

The SSA assigns cases through a workload-balancing algorithm, meaning your assignment to a specific judge is essentially random. There are 12 judges on record at this office since 2016, 6 of whom reported in the latest period. Approval rates across this bench vary significantly, ranging from 34% to 66% on lifetime records. You can expect the same formal hearing process regardless of which judge is assigned to your case.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions