SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Alexis Murdock

Position Administrative Law Judge
On record SSA records since 2016
Decisions 2,720 lifetime

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review
Free
2 minutes
Confidential

Approval rates

The approval rates for Alexis Murdock reflect a significant volume of cases, providing a stable look at past decision patterns. When comparing the latest reporting period, this judge's 79% approval rate stands above the San Antonio office-wide average of 52%, the Texas state average of 56%, and the national average of 58%. These figures are based on 2,720 lifetime decisions. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for your individual hearing.

Lifetime SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 70%
Decisions on record 2,720
Latest SSA reporting period July 31, 2026
Metric Judge Murdock San Antonio National
Approval rate 79% 52% 58%
Fully favorable 74%
Denials 21%

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Murdock's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Murdock
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY26
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

Since 2016, Alexis Murdock has maintained a consistent record of approvals. While the annual rate fluctuated between 58% and 79% over the last decade, the trend has shown an upward shift in recent years. The latest reporting period shows a 79% approval rate, a continuation of the higher approval levels seen since 2024. This pattern reflects a steady approach to evaluating your disability claim based on the evidence you present.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Murdock's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the San Antonio hearing office

The San Antonio hearing office serves a large population across Texas, managing a high volume of SSDI claims. With 23 judges on record, the office maintains an office-wide latest-period approval rate of 52%. You can expect a formal administrative process focused on your medical and vocational evidence. You can see the San Antonio Hearing Office page for the full ALJ roster.

Other judges at this hearing office

The Social Security Administration uses a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning your assignment to Alexis Murdock is essentially random. There are 23 judges on record at this office since 2016, 17 of whom reported in the latest period, with lifetime approval rates ranging from 18% to 70%. Because approval rates vary across this bench, understanding the office environment is helpful. For your preparation, the guidance remains consistent regardless of which judge you are assigned.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions