SSDI Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Rudolph Murgo

SSDI Administrative Law Judge at the Portland OR Hearing Office · 5 years on the bench · 13,397 lifetime decisions

Hearing scheduled with Judge Murgo?

Free Benefits Review →
Free
2 minutes
Confidential

Approval rates

Comparing a judge's approval rate to broader averages provides perspective on the hearing landscape. Judge Murgo has maintained a 39% lifetime approval rate over 13,397 decisions. This contrasts with the latest Portland OR office average of 68% and the national average of 58%. These figures provide a look at historical trends, though they do not predict the outcome of your specific hearing.

Metric Judge Murgo Portland OR National
Approval rate 39% 68% 58%
Fully favorable 33%
Denials 61%

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Murgo's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Murgo
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY20
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total dispositions excluding dismissals.

Decision pattern

Over a 5-year tenure and 13,397 lifetime decisions, the approval rate for Judge Murgo has fluctuated. While the rate reached 45% in 2017, recent data indicates 22% in 2020. This shift reflects a departure from earlier patterns, which may be due to changes in case mix or evidence requirements. You can find more information on the Portland OR Hearing Office page.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Murgo's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing with Judge Murgo? See if a free benefits review fits your case.

Free Benefits Review
Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Portland OR hearing office

The Portland OR Hearing Office serves you throughout Oregon, managing a volume of disability appeals. With a bench of 6 judges, the office maintains an overall latest approval rate of 68%. You can expect a professional environment focused on the evaluation of medical and vocational evidence. To learn more about the local bench, see the Portland OR Hearing Office page for the full ALJ roster.

Other judges at this hearing office

The Social Security Administration uses a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. Within the Portland OR office, lifetime approval rates among the 6 judges vary, ranging from 39% to 76%. While these differences exist, the core requirements for proving disability remain consistent across the entire bench. You can view the full roster on the Portland OR Hearing Office page.

Your odds change dramatically with a lawyer

SSDI hearing approval rates — represented vs. on your own

WITHOUT A LAWYER
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants
Free Benefits Review

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions