SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Daniel Myers

Position Administrative Law Judge
On record SSA records since 2016
Decisions 2,980 lifetime

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review
Free
2 minutes
Confidential

Approval rates

Evaluating your chances requires looking at the broader context of the Sacramento hearing office. While the office-wide lifetime approval rates for judges on record range from 39% to 80%, your specific outcome depends on the unique medical evidence and vocational factors in your file. With 2,980 decisions on record, the data provides a clear view of how this judge has historically approached cases. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for your individual hearing.

Lifetime SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 56%
Decisions on record 2,980

SSA has not published a latest-period approval, fully favorable or denial breakdown for Judge Myers. The most recent period with decisions on record is September 29, 2023. Those rows are left out rather than estimated.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Myers's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Myers
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY23
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

The record for Myers shows a steady evolution in decision-making since 2016. After starting with a 48% approval rate, the data indicates a gradual shift, reaching a peak of 66% in 2020 before stabilizing in more recent years. This trend reflects a consistent approach to evaluating disability claims over the 2,980 decisions on record. The latest period shows a return toward the long-term average, suggesting a continuation of this established pattern.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Myers's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Sacramento hearing office

The Sacramento hearing office serves a wide region in California, managing a significant volume of disability claims. With 20 judges on record, the office maintains a professional environment where you present your case before an ALJ. The office-wide latest-period approval rate is 68%, reflecting the local standards for evidence and testimony. You can see the Sacramento Hearing Office page for the full ALJ roster.

Other judges at this hearing office

The Social Security Administration uses a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. There are 20 judges on record at this office since 2016, 6 of whom reported in the latest SSA period, with lifetime approval rates ranging from 39% to 80%. Because of this variance, understanding the local bench is a standard part of hearing preparation. For preparation purposes, the guidance is the same regardless of which judge you are assigned.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions