Saul W. Nathanson is an SSA Administrative Law Judge at the Charlotte office, maintaining a lifetime approval rate of 79% over 936 decisions. This sits above the national average of 58%. While these statistics offer a view into past performance, they are not a prediction for your specific hearing. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not individual outcomes, and an attorney can help you prepare for this judge's specific bench.
This page presents publicly available SSA Office of Hearings Operations disposition data, with no editorial rating or evaluation. ALJs are independent decisionmakers; aggregate statistics describe past patterns, not predictions of how any individual case will be decided. Information here is provided for hearing preparation, not as legal advice.
Approval rates
When evaluating your case, it is helpful to look at how a judge's approval rate compares to broader benchmarks. Judge Nathanson's 79% lifetime approval rate is higher than the Charlotte Hearing Office average of 72% and significantly above the national average of 58%. These figures are derived from 936 lifetime decisions, providing a clear statistical baseline. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for your individual hearing.
Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.
Approval rate over time
Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Nathanson's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.
Decision pattern
Over his tenure, Judge Nathanson has maintained an approval rate of 79% across 936 lifetime decisions. This consistency suggests a stable approach to evaluating your evidence and medical documentation. While his rate is higher than many peers, it reflects a pattern of decision-making that has remained reliable throughout his time on the bench. Recent data indicates that his approach to case evaluation continues to align with this established trend.
Preparing for an SSDI hearing
The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Nathanson's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.
- Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
- Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
- Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
- Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.
Hearing with Judge Nathanson? Free, confidential — see if you qualify for SSDI.
Free Benefits ReviewAbout the Charlotte hearing office
The Charlotte Hearing Office serves a large population across North Carolina, managing a high volume of SSDI and SSI cases. With a bench of 6 judges, the office maintains an average approval rate of 72%. You can expect a formal environment where the quality of your medical evidence is the primary factor in a favorable outcome. You can visit the Charlotte Hearing Office page for the full ALJ roster.
Other judges at this hearing office
The Social Security Administration assigns cases through a workload-balancing algorithm, meaning your assignment to a specific judge is essentially random. Within the Charlotte Hearing Office, lifetime approval rates among the bench vary significantly, ranging from 28% to 79%. This variance highlights why understanding the local judicial landscape is important for your preparation. For preparation purposes, the guidance remains consistent regardless of which judge you are assigned.
Your odds change dramatically with a lawyer
SSDI hearing approval rates — represented vs. on your own
Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.
