SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Saul W. Nathanson

Last decided CharlotteSep 2016
Decisions 104since 2016

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review

Approval rates

The 79% approval rate for Saul W. Nathanson reflects all 104 decisions on record since 2016. This is measured against the 29% to 83% range of the 18 judges whose most recent office on record is Charlotte. These figures provide context for how different judicial approaches can impact case outcomes.

All decisions on record SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 79%
Decisions on record 104

SSA has not published a latest-period approval, fully favorable or denial breakdown for Judge Nathanson. The most recent period with decisions on record is September 30, 2016. Those rows are left out rather than estimated.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Nathanson's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Nathanson
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

The approval rate for Saul W. Nathanson is based on 104 decisions on record since 2016. Throughout the 2016 data window, the approval rate remained at 79%. This consistency provides a historical reference point for how evidence was evaluated during that period.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Nathanson's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Charlotte hearing office

The Charlotte hearing office serves you and other claimants throughout North Carolina. With 18 judges whose most recent office on record is this location, the bench represents a wide spectrum of decision patterns. You can expect a formal process focused on the specific medical evidence presented in your file.

Other judges whose most recent office on record is Charlotte

The Social Security Administration uses a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. There are 18 judges whose most recent office on record is the Charlotte hearing office, with approval rates ranging from 29% to 83% on their since-2016 records. Understanding that your judge is assigned by chance highlights the importance of thorough preparation.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
1×
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions