Lawrence J. Neary is an ALJ at the Harrisburg office. With a lifetime approval rate of 55% over 17,262 decisions, his record sits slightly below the national average of 58%. While his recent approval rates have shown an upward trend, remember that aggregate data describes past patterns, not specific hearing outcomes. An attorney can help you prepare for the specific requirements of this judge's courtroom.
This page presents publicly available SSA Office of Hearings Operations disposition data, with no editorial rating or evaluation. ALJs are independent decisionmakers; aggregate statistics describe past patterns, not predictions of how any individual case will be decided. Information here is provided for hearing preparation, not as legal advice.
Approval rates
Comparing a judge's approval rate to office and national benchmarks provides context for your hearing. Judge Neary maintains a lifetime approval rate of 55%, which aligns with the state average and sits within a few points of the national standard. These figures are derived from a substantial docket of 17,262 lifetime decisions, offering a clear view of historical trends.
Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.
Approval rate over time
Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Neary's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.
Decision pattern
Over his 7 years on the bench, Judge Neary has shown a consistent approach to SSDI cases. While his annual approval rates have fluctuated—ranging from a low of 47% in 2018 to a high of 61% in 2022—the overall trend reflects a steady commitment to evaluating evidence. The most recent reporting period shows an approval rate 12 points higher than the office average, suggesting a recent shift in case outcomes.
Preparing for an SSDI hearing
The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Neary's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.
- Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
- Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
- Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
- Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.
Hearing with Judge Neary? Free, confidential — see if you qualify for SSDI.
Free Benefits ReviewAbout the Harrisburg hearing office
The Harrisburg Hearing Office serves a significant portion of Pennsylvania, managing a high volume of disability claims. With a bench of 6 judges, the office maintains an office-wide latest approval rate of 43%. You can expect a formal proceeding where your evidence quality is the primary driver of the outcome.
Other judges at this hearing office
The Social Security Administration assigns cases through a workload-balancing algorithm, meaning your assignment to a specific judge is essentially random. Across the Harrisburg Hearing Office, lifetime approval rates for the bench range from 29% to 65%. Because of this variance, understanding the general environment of your hearing office is helpful.
Your odds change dramatically with a lawyer
SSDI hearing approval rates — represented vs. on your own
Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.
