SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Lawrence J. Neary

Last decided HarrisburgSep 2022
Decisions 2,592since 2016

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review

Approval rates

Comparing approval rates requires looking at the same data window to ensure accuracy. The 56% approval rate for Lawrence J. Neary reflects all decisions on record since 2016, which can be measured against the 17% to 86% range observed among other judges whose most recent office on record is Harrisburg. This range highlights the variance in outcomes across the local bench. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for your individual hearing.

All decisions on record SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 56%
Decisions on record 2,592

SSA has not published a latest-period approval, fully favorable or denial breakdown for Judge Neary. The most recent period with decisions on record is September 30, 2022. Those rows are left out rather than estimated.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Neary's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Neary
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY22
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

The approval rate for Lawrence J. Neary has remained relatively consistent across the 2,592 decisions on record since 2016. While yearly fluctuations occurred, the trend shows a steady pattern of approvals, with the most recent data points in 2022 showing a 62% approval rate. This stability suggests that the judge's approach to evaluating evidence has been consistent over the observed period.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Neary's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Harrisburg hearing office

The Harrisburg hearing office serves you throughout the region. With 13 judges whose most recent office on record is this location, the office handles a diverse range of disability claims. You can expect a formal hearing process where the quality of your medical evidence is the primary factor in the outcome. You can see the Harrisburg hearing office page for the full ALJ roster.

Other judges whose most recent office on record is Harrisburg

The Social Security Administration uses a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. There are 13 judges whose most recent office on record is Harrisburg, and their approval rates vary significantly, ranging from 17% to 86% on their since-2016 records. Five of these judges decided cases in the most recent SSA file. For preparation purposes, the guidance is the same regardless of which judge you are assigned.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
1×
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions