SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Donald K. Neely

Position Administrative Law Judge
On record SSA records since 2016
Decisions 2,936 lifetime

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review
Free
2 minutes
Confidential

Approval rates

The approval rates for Neely reflect a consistent history of decision-making within the Baltimore office. While his lifetime rate stands at 69%, the broader bench at this office shows a wide range of outcomes, spanning from 32% to 79% across all judges on record. Comparing his latest-period performance to the office, state, and national averages helps contextualize his recent activity.

Lifetime SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 69%
Decisions on record 2,936
Latest SSA reporting period July 31, 2026
Metric Judge Neely Baltimore National
Approval rate 69% 60% 58%
Fully favorable 54%
Denials 31%

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Neely's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Neely
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY26
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

Since 2016, Neely has maintained a steady approval pattern that has remained largely consistent over the last decade. His latest-period approval rate of 69% aligns closely with his long-term average. This stability suggests a predictable approach to evaluating evidence and medical testimony.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Neely's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Baltimore hearing office

The Baltimore hearing office serves you throughout the region, operating as a critical hub for SSDI adjudication in Maryland. The office maintains a bench of 26 judges on record, with a latest-period office-wide approval rate of 60%. You can expect a rigorous review process where the quality of medical evidence is the primary driver of the outcome.

Other judges at this hearing office

The Baltimore hearing office utilizes a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning you cannot request a specific judge. There are 26 judges on record at this office since 2016, 10 of whom reported in the latest period. With a lifetime approval range of 32% to 79% across the bench, the judge you draw can influence the procedural flow of your hearing.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions