SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Julio Ocampo

Last decided OrlandoSep 2025
Decisions 2,420since 2017

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review

Approval rates

This table compares the approval rate of Julio Ocampo against the broader bench at the Orlando hearing office. By looking at the range of outcomes for the 17 judges whose most recent office on record is this one, you can see how this judge's 62% approval rate fits within the local context. These figures are based on 2,420 decisions on record since 2017. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for your hearing.

All decisions on record SSA records since 2017
Approval rate 62%
Decisions on record 2,420

SSA has not published a latest-period approval, fully favorable or denial breakdown for Judge Ocampo. The most recent period with decisions on record is September 26, 2025. Those rows are left out rather than estimated.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Ocampo's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Ocampo
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY17FY25
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

Since 2017, Julio Ocampo has presided over 2,420 decisions. The yearly trend shows fluctuation, with approval rates moving from 78% in 2017 to 53% in 2018, followed by a period of relative stability before a rise to 74% in 2025. This pattern suggests that the judge's decision-making has evolved over the years on record, potentially reflecting changes in case mix or evidence quality.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Ocampo's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Orlando hearing office

The Orlando hearing office serves you and other claimants across Florida. There are 17 judges whose most recent office on record is this one, and the office-wide latest-period approval rate is 60%. You can expect a standard administrative hearing process where medical documentation and vocational testimony are central to the outcome. You can see the Orlando hearing office page for the full ALJ roster.

Other judges whose most recent office on record is Orlando

The Social Security Administration uses a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. There are 17 judges whose most recent office on record is the Orlando hearing office, with approval rates ranging from 34% to 89% on their since-2016 records. Because you cannot choose your judge, focusing on the strength of your medical evidence is the most effective way to prepare.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
1×
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions