SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Nicholas M. Ohanesian

Position Administrative Law Judge
On record SSA records since 2016
Decisions 4,000 lifetime

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review
Free
2 minutes
Confidential

Approval rates

Comparing the record of Nicholas M. Ohanesian to the broader Grand Rapids bench provides context for your hearing. While the judge maintains a 60% lifetime approval rate, the office-wide lifetime range spans from 43% to 88%. In the most recent reporting period, Nicholas M. Ohanesian approved 67% of cases, which sits 7 points above the office average. These figures are based on 4,000 lifetime decisions. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for individual hearings.

Lifetime SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 60%
Decisions on record 4,000
Latest SSA reporting period July 31, 2026
Metric Judge Ohanesian Grand Rapids National
Approval rate 67% 60% 58%
Fully favorable 56%
Denials 33%

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Ohanesian's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Ohanesian
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY26
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

The approval trend for Nicholas M. Ohanesian has shown a notable shift over the last decade. After hovering in the low-to-mid 50% range between 2016 and 2019, the approval rate moved upward, reaching 71% in 2024 and 2025. This pattern suggests a recent period of higher allowance rates compared to the earlier years of the record. The latest period reflects a continuation of this steady pattern, though each case remains unique based on the medical evidence you provide.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Ohanesian's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Grand Rapids hearing office

The Grand Rapids hearing office serves you throughout Michigan, operating as a key hub for disability adjudications. The office bench consists of 10 judges on record, maintaining an office-wide latest-period approval rate of 60%. You can expect a formal process focused on the specific medical evidence supporting your claim. You can see the Grand Rapids Hearing Office page for the full ALJ roster.

Other judges at this hearing office

The Social Security Administration assigns cases through a workload-balancing algorithm, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. There are 10 judges on record at this office since 2016, 6 of whom reported in the latest period. Approval rates across this bench vary significantly, with lifetime records ranging from 43% to 88%. For preparation purposes, the guidance is the same regardless of which judge you are assigned.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions