SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. William G. Reamon

On record 4,566 decisions since 2016

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review

Approval rates

Comparing approval rates provides context for your upcoming hearing, though it is important to look at figures from the same reporting period. While William G. Reamon maintains a 45% lifetime approval rate, his latest-period approval rate of 46% sits 14 points below the Grand Rapids office average of 60%. These figures are derived from a docket of 4,566 lifetime decisions. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for your individual hearing.

Lifetime SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 45%
Decisions on record 4,566
Latest SSA reporting period July 31, 2026
Metric Judge Reamon Grand Rapids National
Approval rate 46% 60% 58%
Fully favorable 33%
Denials 54%

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Reamon's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Reamon
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY26
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

The record for William G. Reamon spans 4,566 decisions since 2016. His yearly approval trend has remained steady, fluctuating within a moderate range over the last decade. While the latest-period approval rate of 46% shows a slight divergence from his lifetime average, the overall pattern suggests a consistent approach to case evaluation. This steady trend provides a stable baseline for understanding how he has historically handled disability claims.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Reamon's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Grand Rapids hearing office

The Grand Rapids hearing office serves you throughout Michigan, operating as a key hub for the region. With 10 judges on record, the office maintains an office-wide latest-period approval rate of 60%. You can expect a formal legal proceeding where evidence quality is the primary factor in a favorable outcome. See the Grand Rapids Hearing Office page for the full ALJ roster.

Other judges at this hearing office

The Social Security Administration uses a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning your assignment to a specific judge is essentially random. There are 10 judges on record at the Grand Rapids office since 2016, 6 of whom reported in the latest period. The lifetime approval rates across this bench range from 43% to 88%. For preparation purposes, the guidance is the same regardless of which judge you are assigned.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions