SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Jason Panek

Last decided Akron OHJul 2026
Decisions 3,053since 2017

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review

Approval rates

Comparing approval rates requires looking at the same timeframes to ensure accuracy. While Jason Panek has a 43% approval rate on record since 2017, his latest-period approval rate is 50%. This latest figure sits 3 points below the Akron OH office average of 53%, 5 points below the state average, and 8 points below the national average. These statistics are based on a significant volume of decisions, providing a stable look at past performance.

All decisions on record SSA records since 2017
Approval rate 43%
Decisions on record 3,053
Latest SSA reporting period July 31, 2026
Metric Judge Panek Akron OH National
Approval rate 50% 53% 58%
Fully favorable 43% — —
Denials 50% — —

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Panek's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Panek
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY18FY26
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

The approval rate for Jason Panek has fluctuated since 2017, moving from 55% in 2018 to a low of 36% in 2021 before reaching 50% in the most recent partial fiscal year. With 3,053 decisions on record, this pattern reflects a shift in outcomes over time. The latest period shows an increase compared to his long-term average, which may reflect changes in case mix or evidence quality.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Panek's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Akron OH hearing office

Jason Panek's most recent office on record is the Akron OH hearing office, which serves you throughout the region. This office maintains a bench of 13 judges whose most recent records are tied to this location, with an office-wide latest-period approval rate of 53%. You can expect a standard hearing process focused on your medical evidence and vocational testimony.

Other judges whose most recent office on record is Akron OH

The Social Security Administration uses a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. There are 13 judges whose most recent office on record is the Akron OH hearing office, and 7 of them decided cases here in the latest file through July 2026. Approval rates across this bench range from 43% to 80% on their records since 2016. For preparation purposes, the guidance is the same regardless of which judge you are assigned.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
1×
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions