SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Troy M. Patterson

Last decided Franklin TNSep 2020
Decisions 2,036since 2016

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review

Approval rates

Evaluating a judge's history requires looking at the broader context of their peers. The 59% approval rate for Troy M. Patterson sits within a range of 29% to 76% for the 14 judges whose most recent office on record is the Franklin TN hearing office. This comparison is based on records since 2016, providing a baseline for understanding how different judges have historically approached their dockets.

All decisions on record SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 59%
Decisions on record 2,036

SSA has not published a latest-period approval, fully favorable or denial breakdown for Judge Patterson. The most recent period with decisions on record is September 25, 2020. Those rows are left out rather than estimated.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Patterson's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Patterson
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY20
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

The approval rate for Troy M. Patterson has fluctuated across the 2,036 decisions on record since 2016. After an initial approval rate of 61% in 2016, the annual figures saw a peak of 66% in 2017 before declining to 53% in 2018. The rate then showed a recovery, reaching 57% in 2019 and 64% by 2020. This trend suggests that your judge's decision-making has varied over time, which may reflect changes in the complexity of cases or the evidence presented.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Patterson's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Franklin TN hearing office

The Franklin TN hearing office has been the site of 2,036 decisions by Troy M. Patterson on record since 2016. This office is part of a larger network of SSA hearing locations, and it is staffed by 14 judges whose most recent office on record is this location. You can expect a formal administrative process focused on medical evidence and vocational testimony. You can see the Franklin TN Hearing Office page for the full ALJ roster.

Other judges whose most recent office on record is Franklin TN

The Social Security Administration uses a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. There are 14 judges whose most recent office on record is the Franklin TN hearing office, with approval rates ranging from 29% to 76% on their since-2016 records. While you cannot choose your judge, understanding the range of outcomes at this office provides helpful context for your hearing.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
1×
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions