Edgar J. Perkerson is an SSA Administrative Law Judge at the Covington GA hearing office. Over 2 years on the bench and 2,400 lifetime decisions, Judge Perkerson has maintained a 62% approval rate. This sits 4 percentage points above the national average of 58%. Because case assignment is random, understanding these patterns is helpful, though aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for your specific hearing. An attorney can help you prepare for this judge's specific bench.
This page presents publicly available SSA Office of Hearings Operations disposition data, with no editorial rating or evaluation. ALJs are independent decisionmakers; aggregate statistics describe past patterns, not predictions of how any individual case will be decided. Information here is provided for hearing preparation, not as legal advice.
Approval rates
Judge Perkerson's approval rate is calculated based on 2,400 lifetime decisions. In the latest reporting period, this judge's rate is 4 percentage points higher than both the state and national averages of 58%. While the office average currently stands at 68%, these figures provide a snapshot of the judicial environment rather than a guarantee of your outcome.
Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.
Approval rate over time
Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Perkerson's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.
Decision pattern
Over a 2-year tenure, Judge Perkerson has shown a shift in approval patterns. Starting with a 59% approval rate in 2016, the data indicates an increase to 69% in 2017. These patterns are common as judges settle into their dockets, and the latest period reflects a continuation of this steady pattern.
Preparing for an SSDI hearing
The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Perkerson's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.
- Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
- Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
- Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
- Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.
Hearing with Judge Perkerson? See if a free benefits review fits your case.
Check My BenefitsAbout the Covington GA hearing office
The Covington GA hearing office serves you throughout the region, managing a high volume of disability cases. With 6 judges on the bench, the office maintains a latest approval rate of 68%. You can expect a formal administrative process focused on medical evidence and vocational testimony.
Other judges at this hearing office
The Covington GA hearing office utilizes a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning your assignment to Judge Perkerson is essentially random. Across the office's bench of 6 judges, lifetime approval rates vary significantly, ranging from 40% to 71%. This variance highlights the importance of presenting a well-documented case regardless of the specific judge assigned.
Your odds change dramatically with a lawyer
SSDI hearing approval rates — represented vs. on your own
Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.
