SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Gina Pesaresi

Position Administrative Law Judge
On record SSA records since 2016
Decisions 2,068 lifetime

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review
Free
2 minutes
Confidential

Approval rates

The approval rate for Judge Gina Pesaresi is calculated from 2,068 lifetime decisions made between 2016 and 2024. Within the Jersey City hearing office, lifetime approval rates among the bench range from 44% to 79%. These figures offer a view of historical patterns rather than a guarantee of your future results, as aggregate rates describe past decisions rather than predictions for your individual hearing.

Lifetime SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 61%
Decisions on record 2,068

SSA has not published a latest-period approval, fully favorable or denial breakdown for Judge Pesaresi. The most recent period with decisions on record is April 26, 2024. Those rows are left out rather than estimated.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Pesaresi's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Pesaresi
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY17FY24
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

Since 2016, the approval rate for Judge Gina Pesaresi has remained relatively consistent, with a peak in 2023 at 74%. Her record shows a steady pattern of adjudication, with the most recent data from 2024 showing a 64% approval rate. This trend suggests a stable approach to evaluating your disability claim, though yearly fluctuations often occur due to changes in case complexity or the specific medical evidence you present.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Pesaresi's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Jersey City hearing office

The Jersey City hearing office serves claimants across the region, maintaining a bench of 11 judges to process disability applications. You can expect a formal hearing process where the judge evaluates your medical documentation against 20 CFR Part 404 standards. The office-wide latest-period approval rate is 65%. You can visit the Jersey City Hearing Office page for the full ALJ roster.

Other judges at this hearing office

The Social Security Administration utilizes a random workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning you cannot choose your judge. At the Jersey City hearing office, there are 11 judges on record since 2016, with 10 currently reporting in the latest period. Approval rates across this bench vary significantly, spanning from 44% to 79%. Your preparation remains the same regardless of which judge is assigned to your case.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions