SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. S. Pines

Position Administrative Law Judge
On record SSA records since 2016
Decisions 3,539 lifetime

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review
Free
2 minutes
Confidential

Approval rates

Comparing judicial records requires looking at consistent timeframes. While your lifetime approval rate for S. Pines sits at 66%, recent data shows a 65% approval rate during the latest reporting period. This performance is 1 percentage point above the Portland OR office average of 64% for the same period. These figures are derived from a significant volume of cases, providing a stable statistical baseline.

Lifetime SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 66%
Decisions on record 3,539
Latest SSA reporting period July 31, 2026
Metric Judge Pines Portland OR National
Approval rate 65% 64% 58%
Fully favorable 61%
Denials 35%

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Pines's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Pines
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY26
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

The record for S. Pines shows a steady evolution in approval patterns since 2016. After starting at 55% in the early years of the data window, the approval rate trended upward, reaching a peak of 76% in 2025 before adjusting to 65% in the most recent period. This movement across 3,539 lifetime decisions suggests a judge who responds to the specific evidence presented in each case. The latest period reflects a return toward the long-term average after a period of higher approvals.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Pines's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Portland OR hearing office

The Portland OR hearing office serves you throughout the region, managing a diverse caseload of disability applications. The office maintains a bench of 12 judges who collectively handle the local docket. With a latest-period office-wide approval rate of 64%, the environment is focused on the objective evaluation of medical evidence. For more information, see the Portland OR Hearing Office page for the full ALJ roster.

Other judges at this hearing office

The SSA assigns cases using a workload-balancing algorithm, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. There are 12 judges on record at this office since 2016, 6 of whom reported in the latest period. Approval rates across this bench vary significantly, ranging from 34% to 66% over their respective lifetimes. For preparation purposes, the guidance is the same regardless of which judge you are assigned.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions