SSDI Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Tara J. Posner

SSDI Administrative Law Judge at the Baltimore Hearing Office · 8 years on the bench · 13,304 lifetime decisions

Hearing scheduled with Judge Posner?

Free Benefits Review →
Free
2 minutes
Confidential

Approval rates

Judge Posner maintains a lifetime approval rate of 61%, which compares favorably to the current national average of 58%. In the most recent reporting period, the judge recorded an approval rate of 60%, which is 5 percentage points below the current Baltimore Hearing Office average of 66%. These statistics are derived from a docket of 13,304 lifetime decisions. These aggregate rates describe past trends rather than individual hearing outcomes.

Metric Judge Posner Baltimore National
Approval rate 61% 66% 58%
Fully favorable 44%
Denials 40%

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Posner's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Posner
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY18FY25
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total dispositions excluding dismissals.

Decision pattern

Over 8 years on the bench, Judge Posner has seen her approval rate fluctuate, rising from 56% in 2019 to a peak of 70% in 2023. While the rate moderated to 65% in 2025, the overall trend reflects a period of increased approvals compared to your early tenure. This pattern suggests a judge who has refined her approach to evidence over time.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Posner's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing with Judge Posner? See if a free benefits review fits your case.

Free Benefits Review
Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Baltimore hearing office

The Baltimore Hearing Office serves a large population across Maryland. With a bench of 6 judges, the office maintains a current approval rate of 66%. You can expect a professional environment focused on the evaluation of medical and vocational evidence. You can visit the Baltimore Hearing Office page for more information on the local roster.

Other judges at this hearing office

The Social Security Administration assigns cases to judges using a workload-balancing algorithm, meaning your assignment is essentially random. Across the Baltimore Hearing Office, lifetime approval rates for the 6 judges on the bench range from 46% to 81%. Because of this variance, the judge you draw can influence the procedural flow of your hearing.

Your odds change dramatically with a lawyer

SSDI hearing approval rates — represented vs. on your own

WITHOUT A LAWYER
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants
Free Benefits Review

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions