SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Susan Preston

Last decided MorgantownJul 2026
Decisions 3,153since 2016

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review

Approval rates

Comparing approval rates requires looking at data from the same timeframes. While your judge's overall approval rate on record since 2016 is 67%, recent data shows a 72% approval rate during the latest reporting period. This latest-period figure sits 12 points above the Morgantown office average of 60%. These figures provide context for the judge's decision-making history, though aggregate rates describe past decisions rather than predictions for your hearing.

All decisions on record SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 67%
Decisions on record 3,153
Latest SSA reporting period July 31, 2026
Metric Judge Preston Morgantown National
Approval rate 72% 60% 58%
Fully favorable 70% — —
Denials 28% — —

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Preston's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Preston
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY26
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

Since 2016, your judge's approval rate has varied. After an initial period of fluctuation, the rate has seen a rise in recent years, with the latest period reflecting a 72% approval rate. This recent performance remains higher than the 67% average observed across all 3,153 decisions on record. The latest period reflects a continuation of this trend, which may be influenced by changes in case mix or the quality of evidence presented.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Preston's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Morgantown hearing office

Susan Preston's most recent office on record is the Morgantown hearing office, which serves claimants across West Virginia. This office is part of a regional network where judges manage diverse caseloads, and the office-wide latest-period approval rate is 60%. You can expect a formal process where evidence quality is the primary factor in your decision. You can see the Morgantown Hearing Office page for the full ALJ roster.

Other judges whose most recent office on record is Morgantown

The Social Security Administration uses a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. Within the Morgantown hearing office, there are 10 judges whose most recent office on record is this one. These judges show a wide range of approval rates, spanning from 21% to 67% on their records since 2016. Preparation remains consistent regardless of which judge is assigned to your case.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
1×
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions