SSDI Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Curtis Renoe

SSDI Administrative Law Judge at the Sacramento Hearing Office · 3 years on the bench · 3,803 lifetime decisions

Check My Benefits →
Free
2 minutes
Confidential

Approval rates

Comparing a judge's approval rate to broader benchmarks provides context for your hearing. Judge Renoe's 48% lifetime approval rate is measured against the Sacramento Hearing Office latest rate of 65% and the national average of 58%. With 3,803 lifetime decisions on record, the data offers a stable look at his historical approach to disability claims. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for your individual hearing.

Metric Judge Renoe Sacramento National
Approval rate 48% 65% 58%
Fully favorable 41%
Denials 52%

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Renoe's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Renoe
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY18
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total dispositions excluding dismissals.

Decision pattern

Over his 3-year tenure, Judge Renoe's approval rate has shown a downward trend. Starting at 55% in 2016, the rate shifted to 51% in 2017 and reached 41% in 2018. This pattern indicates a consistent shift in outcomes over the course of his time on the bench. These figures are based on 3,803 lifetime decisions, reflecting a significant volume of case reviews.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Renoe's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing with Judge Renoe? See if a free benefits review fits your case.

Check My Benefits
Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Sacramento hearing office

The Sacramento Hearing Office serves a large population of claimants across Northern California. It maintains a bench of 6 judges who manage a high volume of disability cases annually. The office currently reports an approval rate of 65%, which is higher than both the state and national averages. You can visit the Sacramento Hearing Office page for the full ALJ roster.

Other judges at this hearing office

The Social Security Administration utilizes a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning your assignment to Judge Renoe is essentially random. Within the Sacramento Hearing Office, lifetime approval rates among the 6 judges range from 48% to 75%. This variance highlights why understanding the local bench is important for your hearing strategy.

Your odds change dramatically with a lawyer

SSDI hearing approval rates — represented vs. on your own

WITHOUT A LAWYER
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants
Check My Benefits

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions