SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Curtis Renoe

Last decided SacramentoSep 2018
Decisions 559since 2016

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review

Approval rates

Comparing approval rates requires looking at data from the same timeframe to ensure accuracy. The 48% approval rate for Curtis Renoe reflects his total decisions on record since 2016, which you can measure against the 39% to 80% range of other judges whose most recent office on record is Sacramento. These figures provide a statistical baseline derived from hundreds of cases. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for your individual hearing.

All decisions on record SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 48%
Decisions on record 559

SSA has not published a latest-period approval, fully favorable or denial breakdown for Judge Renoe. The most recent period with decisions on record is September 28, 2018. Those rows are left out rather than estimated.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Renoe's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Renoe
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY18
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

The approval rate for Curtis Renoe across 559 decisions on record since 2016 shows a fluctuating pattern. After an initial 44% approval rate in 2016, the rate rose to 52% in 2017 before declining to 41% in 2018. This variation highlights how case mix and evidentiary standards can influence outcomes over time. The data reflects a period of activity that ended in 2018, providing a historical view of how this judge evaluated disability claims.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Renoe's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Sacramento hearing office

The Sacramento hearing office serves you and other claimants across the region. With 20 judges whose most recent office on record is this one, the office manages a diverse volume of disability claims. You can expect a formal hearing process where the quality of your medical evidence is the primary factor in the decision. You can visit the Sacramento Hearing Office page for the full ALJ roster.

Other judges whose most recent office on record is Sacramento

The Social Security Administration uses a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. There are 20 judges whose most recent office on record is Sacramento, with approval rates ranging from 39% to 80% on their since-2016 records. Because each judge evaluates evidence differently, understanding the range of outcomes at this office is helpful. For your preparation, the guidance remains consistent regardless of which judge you are assigned.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
1×
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions