SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. George W. Reyes

Last decided TucsonSep 2023
Decisions 2,481since 2016

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review

Approval rates

Comparing approval rates requires looking at data from the same timeframe to ensure accuracy. The 79% approval rate for George W. Reyes reflects all decisions on record since 2016, which we measure against the 50% to 79% range of other judges whose most recent office on record is the Tucson Hearing Office. This comparison provides a view of how this judge's record aligns with the local bench. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for your individual hearing.

All decisions on record SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 79%
Decisions on record 2,481

SSA has not published a latest-period approval, fully favorable or denial breakdown for Judge Reyes. The most recent period with decisions on record is September 29, 2023. Those rows are left out rather than estimated.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Reyes's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Reyes
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY23
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

Since 2016, the approval rate for George W. Reyes has shown a steady trend with yearly fluctuation. After starting at 74% in 2016, the rate reached a peak of 85% in 2021 before settling at 76% in 2023. With 2,481 total decisions on record, this pattern reflects a consistent approach to evaluating your disability claim. The recent data suggests a return toward the long-term average following the higher approval period observed during 2020 and 2021.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Reyes's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Tucson hearing office

The Tucson Hearing Office serves you and other claimants across Arizona and the surrounding region. There are 5 judges whose most recent office on record is this one, and the office-wide latest-period approval rate is 77%. You can expect a standard hearing process focused on the medical and vocational evidence presented in your file.

Other judges whose most recent office on record is Tucson

The Social Security Administration uses a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. There are 5 judges whose most recent office on record is the Tucson Hearing Office, and their approval rates since 2016 range from 50% to 79%. Because you cannot choose your judge, understanding the range of the local bench is helpful for your overall preparation.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
1×
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions