SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Fredric Roberson

Last decided IndianapolisJul 2026
Decisions 3,907since 2017

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review

Approval rates

Comparing performance requires looking at consistent data windows. While Fredric Roberson has a 57% approval rate since 2017, his latest-period approval rate stands at 63%. This latest figure sits 1 percentage point below the Indianapolis office average of 64%, while remaining 5 points above the national average of 58%. These metrics are derived from a significant volume of cases, providing a stable basis for analysis.

All decisions on record SSA records since 2017
Approval rate 57%
Decisions on record 3,907
Latest SSA reporting period July 31, 2026
Metric Judge Roberson Indianapolis National
Approval rate 63% 64% 58%
Fully favorable 58% — —
Denials 37% — —

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Roberson's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Roberson
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY17FY26
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

Since 2017, Fredric Roberson has presided over 3,907 decisions. His approval trend shows variation, starting at 72% in 2017 before moving to 44% in 2018. Since that period, the rate has shown a steady climb, reaching 63% in the most recent partial year of 2026. This latest period suggests a return to higher approval levels compared to his multi-year average.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Roberson's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Indianapolis hearing office

The Indianapolis hearing office serves claimants across Indiana and is a key hub for regional disability processing. With a bench of 20 judges whose most recent office on record is this one, the office maintains a latest-period approval rate of 64%. You can expect a high volume of hearings, where the quality of your medical evidence remains the primary factor in your decision.

Other judges whose most recent office on record is Indianapolis

The Social Security Administration utilizes a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. Within the Indianapolis hearing office, there are 20 judges whose most recent office on record is this one. Approval rates among this group vary widely, ranging from 43% to 75% on their since-2016 records.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
1×
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions