SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Fredric Roberson

Position Administrative Law Judge
On record SSA records since 2017
Decisions 3,907 lifetime

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review
Free
2 minutes
Confidential

Approval rates

Comparing a judge's performance requires looking at consistent timeframes. While Judge Roberson maintains a 57% lifetime approval rate, his latest-period approval rate of 63% sits 1 percentage point below the Indianapolis office average of 64%. These figures are drawn from a substantial docket of 3,907 lifetime decisions, providing a reliable statistical baseline for your research. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for individual hearings.

Lifetime SSA records since 2017
Approval rate 57%
Decisions on record 3,907
Latest SSA reporting period July 31, 2026
Metric Judge Roberson Indianapolis National
Approval rate 63% 64% 58%
Fully favorable 58%
Denials 37%

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Roberson's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Roberson
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY17FY26
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total dispositions excluding dismissals.

Decision pattern

Judge Roberson's approval record shows a dynamic trend since 2017. After an initial period of fluctuation, the approval rate has trended upward, reaching 63% in the most recent reporting period. This latest figure represents a slight increase over his historical average, suggesting a consistent approach to the evidence presented in his courtroom. The data reflects a judge whose decision-making pattern has stabilized over the last several years of his career.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Roberson's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Indianapolis hearing office

The Indianapolis hearing office serves you throughout Indiana, operating as a key hub for the region. With 20 judges on record, the office maintains an office-wide latest-period approval rate of 64%. You can expect a formal administrative process focused on medical evidence and vocational testimony.

Other judges at this hearing office

The Social Security Administration assigns cases using a workload-balancing algorithm, meaning your assignment to Judge Roberson is essentially random. The Indianapolis office bench includes 20 judges on record since 2016, 11 of whom reported in the latest period. Approval rates across this office vary significantly, with lifetime records ranging from 43% to 75%.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions