SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Linda Gail Roberts-Reap

Last decided Franklin TNJul 2026
Decisions 2,747since 2018

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review

Approval rates

Comparing approval rates requires looking at data from the same timeframe to ensure accuracy. While your judge's overall approval rate since 2018 is 68%, her latest-period approval rate is 75%, which sits 20 points higher than the Franklin TN office's latest-period rate of 55%. These figures are based on a significant volume of decisions, providing a stable look at past performance.

All decisions on record SSA records since 2018
Approval rate 68%
Decisions on record 2,747
Latest SSA reporting period July 31, 2026
Metric Judge Roberts-Reap Franklin TN National
Approval rate 75% 55% 58%
Fully favorable 72% — —
Denials 25% — —

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Roberts-Reap's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Roberts-Reap
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY18FY26
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

Since March 2018, the judge has issued 2,747 decisions. The yearly approval trend shows a generally positive trajectory, with rates climbing from 65% in 2018 to 77% in 2025. The latest fiscal year-to-date period shows a 75% approval rate, maintaining this higher level of favorable outcomes. This recent pattern suggests a consistent approach to evaluating evidence in the most current reporting period.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Roberts-Reap's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Franklin TN hearing office

Linda Gail Roberts-Reap's most recent office on record is the Franklin TN hearing office, with decisions there through July 2026. This office serves you and other residents in Tennessee and the surrounding region, maintaining a bench of 14 judges. The office-wide latest-period approval rate is 55%, which provides a baseline for the local hearing environment.

Other judges whose most recent office on record is Franklin TN

The Social Security Administration uses a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. There are 14 judges whose most recent office on record is this one, and 10 of them decided cases here in SSA's latest file through July 2026. Approval rates across this bench range from 29% to 76% on their records since 2016.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
1×
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions