SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Daniel L. Rubini

Position Administrative Law Judge
On record SSA records since 2016
Decisions 825 lifetime

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review
Free
2 minutes
Confidential

Approval rates

The approval rate for Daniel L. Rubini is based on 825 lifetime decisions, providing a clear look at his record since 2016. When compared to the broader bench at the Elkins Park office, where lifetime approval rates range from 33% to 82%, his 66% rate sits within the established local spectrum. This data reflects a significant volume of cases, offering a stable statistical baseline for your review. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for your individual hearing.

Lifetime SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 66%
Decisions on record 825

SSA has not published a latest-period approval, fully favorable or denial breakdown for Judge Rubini. The most recent period with decisions on record is September 27, 2019. Those rows are left out rather than estimated.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Rubini's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Rubini
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY19
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

Since 2016, the approval trend for Daniel L. Rubini has remained steady, with yearly rates fluctuating between 64% and 69%. His record shows consistent decision-making patterns across 825 lifetime decisions, indicating a stable approach to evaluating your disability claim. While the yearly figures show minor variations, the overall pattern suggests a predictable consistency in how evidence is weighed. This steady trend provides a reliable baseline for understanding how your case may be evaluated.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Rubini's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Elkins Park hearing office

The Elkins Park hearing office serves claimants across the region, maintaining a bench of 25 judges on record to manage the local caseload. With an office-wide latest-period approval rate of 61%, this location handles a high volume of disability hearings. You can expect a formal process focused on your medical documentation and vocational testimony. See the Elkins Park Hearing Office page for the full ALJ roster.

Other judges at this hearing office

The SSA assigns cases through a workload-balancing algorithm, meaning your assignment to Daniel L. Rubini is essentially random. There are 25 judges on record at this office since 2016, with lifetime approval rates varying widely from 33% to 82%. Because each judge has a unique approach to evidence, understanding the office-wide context is helpful. For preparation purposes, the guidance is the same regardless of which judge you are assigned.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions