SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. William E. Sampson

Last decided Fort WorthJul 2026
Decisions 2,426since 2016

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review

Approval rates

Comparing approval rates requires looking at data from the same timeframe. While the 46% approval rate on record since 2016 provides a long-term view, recent performance is measured against the latest reporting period. In the most recent period, the 50% approval rate sits 4 points below the Fort Worth Hearing Office average of 54%. These figures are based on a significant volume of decisions, providing a stable statistical foundation.

All decisions on record SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 46%
Decisions on record 2,426
Latest SSA reporting period July 31, 2026
Metric Judge Sampson Fort Worth National
Approval rate 50% 54% 58%
Fully favorable 50% — —
Denials 50% — —

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Sampson's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Sampson
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY26
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

The approval rate has fluctuated since 2016, showing a peak in 2017 followed by a period of relative stability. With 2,426 decisions on record, the data reflects a consistent approach to evaluating your disability claim. While the latest-period approval rate of 50% is slightly higher than the long-term average, it is based on a limited number of recent decisions. This pattern suggests a steady judicial approach, with recent outcomes remaining generally aligned with historical decision-making trends.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Sampson's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Fort Worth hearing office

The Fort Worth Hearing Office, which is the most recent office on record as of July 2026, serves you and other claimants across the region. This office is part of a larger network of hearing locations in Texas, where bench approval rates vary significantly. You can expect a formal process focused on the medical evidence provided in your file.

Other judges whose most recent office on record is Fort Worth

The Social Security Administration uses a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. There are 15 judges whose most recent office on record is this one, and 6 of them decided cases here in the latest file through July 2026. Approval rates across this bench range from 32% to 63% on their since-2016 records.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
1×
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions